Related: The Hazards of Hauling Hemp
Commentary: Drug Testing Clearinghouse – It's About Time
A drug testing clearinghouse that prevents drivers who test positive for drugs from simply moving to a different fleet looks to be coming in 2020. And it's none too soon for a problem that seems to be getting worse, says Editor in Chief Deborah Lockridge.

A drug testing clearinghouse that prevents drivers who test positive for drugs from simply moving to a different fleet looks to be coming in 2020. And it's none too soon for a problem that seems to be getting worse.
Image: FMCSA
For most of the nearly 30 years I’ve been covering trucking, the industry has been trying to get a federal clearinghouse put in place that will help prevent drivers who test positive for illegal drugs at one company from simply going down the road and getting a job at a different fleet.
It looks like the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration will finally have one in place in 2020. It’s none too soon, as several factors point to the likelihood that there are more drivers out there under the influence of drugs than the official statistics indicate – and that it’s getting worse.
The American Trucking Associations has lobbied for a national clearinghouse of positive test results pretty much ever since the federal government started required drug and alcohol testing of commercial truck drivers in the 1990s.
Finally, in late 2016, the FMCSA published a final rule to set up the Commercial Driver’s License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse, with a compliance date of January 2020.
Why has it taken so long? Other than the overall general slow rulemaking process, my guess is that there has been a sense of complacency. The positive drug test results as tracked by the agency remained around 2% or lower. But those numbers quite likely are higher, and may be on the rise, especially in light of the opioid crisis and increasing numbers of states legalizing marijuana use (which remains illegal for commercial truck drivers.)

HDT File Image
Last year, Quest Diagnostics, one of the primary labs used to conduct employment drug and alcohol tests, reported that the transportation and warehousing industry saw a 21% increase in positivity rates between 2015 and 2017. And that was before four semi-synthetic opioids (including hydrocodone) were added to the federally mandated drug-testing panel for safety-sensitive workers in January 2018. Quest said that change has resulted in increases in year-over-year positivity rates for workers covered by these rules, including truck drivers.
Even more concerning is what fleets are discovering that use hair testing for pre-employment drug tests. Proponents of this testing method argue that hair testing has advantages over urine testing, including a longer detection window, easier collection, and results that are harder to fake. Among those proponents is the Alliance for Driver Safety & Security, an industry-based safety advocacy group for reducing large truck crashes.
One of the requirements for being a fleet member of the Alliance is using hair testing for pre-employment testing of drivers. When these fleets compare their hair-testing results to their urine-testing results, they find approximately nine times more people fail their hair test than the urine test, according to Lane Kidd, managing director of the Alliance.
Yet drivers who fail a hair test at one fleet can simply walk next door to a fleet that only does urine testing and have a far better chance of getting hired.
While hair testing results won’t be a part of the drug and alcohol clearinghouse, at least it’s a step in the right direction, and FMCSA appears to be making progress in meeting the January 2020 deadline. The agency recently announced a website, https://clearinghouse.fmcsa.dot.gov, with information and answers to frequently asked questions.
According to the website, sometime this fall, users will be able to establish an account that will allow access to the clearinghouse once it becomes operational on Jan. 6, 2020. (Although it wouldn’t surprise me if the agency asks for a deadline extension.)
Once it’s fully operational, whether that’s Jan. 6 or another date, use of the clearinghouse will be mandatory to report and query information about driver drug and alcohol program violations.
As with any regulation, there’s always the potential for unintended consequences. Carriers are concerned it could slow down hiring time, for instance. But in general, it’s a long-overdue move.
More Safety & Compliance

$604 Million Verdict Tests Broker Liability After Supreme Court Ruling
C.H. Robinson plans to appeal after a Texas jury found it bore the largest share of responsibility for a fatal 2021 crash, in a case that follows the Supreme Court's Montgomery decision allowing negligent hiring claims against freight brokers.
Read More →
How Fraley & Schilling Improved Logbook Compliance by Over 50%
Fraley & Schilling needed a way to close a compliance workflow gap in its ELD system without adding more work from driver training, reminders, and back-office follow-ups. It found the answer in a custom driver app.
Read More →
Farewell, CDL: Why I'm Giving Up My Commercial Driver's License
After more than 20 years as a CDL holder, HDT Executive Editor Jack Roberts is letting his commercial license expire. Not because he wants to — but because trucking's nuclear verdict crisis has made the risks of public-road test drives too great for editors, manufacturers, and everyone involved.
Read More →
Enhance Fleet Performance with High-Efficiency Auxiliary Power Units
Drive sustainable cost savings while increasing driver comfort during short- and long-haul logistics operations.
Read More →
Wabash Trailers Recalled for Improperly Installed Underride Guards
More than 900 Wabash dry van trailers may not comply with the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard for rear impact guards.
Read More →
Why K&B Trucking Is Embracing AI and Driver Safety Technology
Crunching data and embracing artificial intelligence are key in K&B Trucking's safety efforts, says the company's safety director.
Read More →
The Hidden Problem Behind FMCSA's ELD Revocations
NMFTA researchers say dozens of registered ELDs may be built on the same software platforms, allowing compliance and security concerns to persist even after individual devices are removed from the market.
Read More →
ATRI Wants Motor Carriers for Driver-Facing Camera Study
In this new study, the American Transportation Research Institute will explore how driver-facing cameras can impact safety and operational metrics in trucking fleets.
Read More →
Netradyne Intelligence Uses New AI Agents to Automate Response to In-Cab Camera Data
The company called the next-generation in-cab camera safety platform "a fundamental shift from systems that report on what happened to systems that actively drive what should happen next."
Read More →
Mack, Volvo Issue ‘Do Not Drive’ Recall on Possible Wheel-Offs
Owners will be sent advance notice not to operate their affected vehicles until the remedy is performed.
Read More →

