FMCSA Redefining High Risk Motor Carrier
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration is adopting a new “High Risk” motor carrier definition along with investigative procedural changes aimed at enabling investigators “to take more immediate action against carriers with the highest crash risk.”

Photo: FMCSA

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration is adopting a new “High Risk” motor carrier definition along with investigative procedural changes aimed at enabling investigators “to take more immediate action against carriers with the highest crash risk.”
In its notification, published in the Federal Register for March 7, the agency said the changes are in line with its “continuing efforts to improve CSA” and are in line with recommendations made in the “Blueprint for Safety Leadership: Aligning Enforcement and Risk” report.
That report was issued by a Federal Aviation Administration Independent Review Team (IRT) in back in July 2014.
“The IRT recommended that FMCSA sharpen its priority-setting focus and improve the timeliness of investigator actions on those motor carriers representing the highest risk,” said FMCSA in its notice of the changes.
The agency also said that the IRT report noted that the current “High Risk” definition “does not specify which carriers require the most urgent attention or allow for dynamic risk management.”
FMCSA said that under the new definition, non-passenger (that is, property-carrying) motor carriers are considered “High Risk” if they have two or more of these Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories (BASICs) at or above the 90th percentile for two consecutive months and they have not received an onsite investigation in the previous 18 months: Unsafe Driving, Crash Indicator; HOS Compliance, and Vehicle Maintenance.
As for passenger carriers, they are now deemed “High Risk” if they have two or more of those BASICs at or above the 90th percentile for one month and they have not received an onsite investigation in the past 12 months.
FMCSA contends the new definition will identify fewer at-risk carriers, but “this group of carriers will have a higher crash risk than the group of carriers identified under the current ‘High Risk’ definition.”
The agency stated that the “newly defined ‘High Risk’ list will be the agency's investigative priority,” allowing it “to more promptly conduct investigations of carriers that pose the greatest risk to public safety, rather than placing carriers at high crash risk in a longer queue ofInvestigations.”
FMCSA added that to address those carriers with poor safety performance that will no longer fall under the “High Risk” definition, it will “identify and monitor additional carriers with significant crash risk using dynamic risk management tools recommended by the IRT.”
Comments on the notice must be received on or before May 6,2016 and may be submitted bearing the Docket ID FMCSA-2015-0439 using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal by going to www.regulations.gov and following the online instructions for submitting comments
Fax to 1-202-493-2251
Mail to Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department ofTransportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,Room W12-140, Washington, DC 0590-0001
Hand-deliver or courier to: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays
DOT noted that it posts all comments received without change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal information included in a comment.
More Safety & Compliance

Wabash Trailers Recalled for Improperly Installed Underride Guards
More than 900 Wabash dry van trailers may not comply with the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard for rear impact guards.
Read More →
Why K&B Trucking Is Embracing AI and Driver Safety Technology
Crunching data and embracing artificial intelligence are key in K&B Trucking's safety efforts, says the company's safety director.
Read More →
The Hidden Problem Behind FMCSA's ELD Revocations
NMFTA researchers say dozens of registered ELDs may be built on the same software platforms, allowing compliance and security concerns to persist even after individual devices are removed from the market.
Read More →
ATRI Wants Motor Carriers for Driver-Facing Camera Study
In this new study, the American Transportation Research Institute will explore how driver-facing cameras can impact safety and operational metrics in trucking fleets.
Read More →
Netradyne Intelligence Uses New AI Agents to Automate Response to In-Cab Camera Data
The company called the next-generation in-cab camera safety platform "a fundamental shift from systems that report on what happened to systems that actively drive what should happen next."
Read More →
Mack, Volvo Issue ‘Do Not Drive’ Recall on Possible Wheel-Offs
Owners will be sent advance notice not to operate their affected vehicles until the remedy is performed.
Read More →
Fleetworthy Integrates Lytx Video Snapshots into Safety+ Platform
A new Fleetworthy-Lytx integration gives fleet managers access to video context alongside safety event data, streamlining driver coaching and incident review.
Read More →How Waste Connections is Using Data, Telematics, and AI
How do you manage and maintain more than 18,000 connected trucks? Data. Lots of it.
Read More →
Fleet Advantage: Top Logistics Fleets Outperform National Safety Benchmarks
Fleet Advantage's latest TRUST Safety Index found leading logistics fleets maintained significantly lower out-of-service rates and stronger safety scores than national averages, while highlighting persistent challenges related to tires, brakes, and unsafe driving behaviors.
Read More →
Why Fleet Data Matters More Than Ever at Waste Connections [Watch]
Waste Connections' Chuck Palmer explains how telematics, predictive maintenance, safety analytics, and AI help keep vehicles on the road and drivers safe in this episode of HDT Talks Trucking.
Read More →
