Studies Show Strict Fleet Cell Phone Policies More Effective Than State Cell Phone Laws
A fleet safety study recently released by the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety, suggests that companies that strictly enforce their no-cell-phone policies have a lower crash rate than companies with milder enforcement policies

A fleet safety study recently released by the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety, suggests that companies that strictly enforce their no-cell-phone policies have a lower crash rate than companies with milder enforcement policies.
The year-long Strength in Numbers Fleet Benchmarking Study covered 45 companies, 400,000 vehicles and 8 billion miles traveled. It found the significant commonalities among the leading performers were not only that they were more likely to have a total ban on mobile phone use, but six of the eight leading companies were also more likely to terminate a driver for violating the company's mobile device policy. By comparison, all 13 companies that fell in the bottom of the rankings had some degree of a mobile device policy, but none had the option to terminate a driver for violating the policy.
The participating fleets came from the pharmaceutical, oil and gas, food and beverage, telecommunications, transportation, package delivery and insurance industries. The study participants' crash rate per million miles ranged from less than one to nearly 12.
"This is the first evidence we've seen that shows the combination of a strong mobile device policy and strict consequences can result in lower crash rates," said Bill Windsor, NETS Board Chairman. "The benchmark study shows the potential for well-written state laws combined with strong enforcement to eventually reduce crash rates in the general population."
Policy Versus Regulation
Conversely, in September, researchers at the Highway Loss Data Institute in Arlington, Va., released findings of a study showing laws prohibiting motorists from texting while driving are not bringing down crash rates. The HLDI said crash rates tend to increase after a ban goes into effect.
HDLI (an affiliate of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) released its findings at the annual meeting of the Governors Highway Safety Association, which took place Sept. 25-26 in Kansas City. HDLI's conclusions are based on comparisons of claims rates in four states before and after texting bans were enacted, compared with patterns of claims in nearby states.
"Texting bans haven't reduced crashes at all. In a perverse twist, crashes increased in three of the four states we studied after bans were enacted. It's an indication that texting bans might even increase the risk of texting for drivers who continue to do so despite the laws," says Adrian Lund, president of both HLDI and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood called that study misleading, and accused the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and HLDI of working to discredit his national anti-distracted driving efforts over the last year.
Another study released late last month by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute found that drivers' odds of using a cell phone while driving were 17 percent less likely under a fleet cell phone policy compared to no fleet cell phone policy. However, state cell phone laws did not significantly impact drivers' likelihood in using their cell phone while driving.
Setting Up a Cell Phone Policy
The NETS Strength in Numbers members offer these tips when constructing a corporate mobile device policy:
* Make sure you have a policy, not a guideline. Guidelines are typically interpreted as suggestions and are more difficult to enforce.
* Policy language must be clear. One member's policy prohibits employees from using "any electronic device in any gear other than park." Another company's policy language clearly prohibits "all electronic devices" so there is no confusion over which devices are allowed-they ban them all.
* Contractors should abide by the same rules as employees. Make sure the policy also covers any contractors working on behalf of the organization and that they are aware of and have signed off on the policy.
* Enforcement is key. One NETS member emphasized they make sure their employees and contractors understand "if you break the rules, you don't work for us."
The Strength in Numbers fleet benchmarking study brings together socially responsible companies willing to look at their own crash metrics, compare findings and share what they've learned. The program is for all types of companies and organizations- large or small, local or global, public or private. Participants collect standardized data over a 12-month period.
More info: NETS.
More Safety & Compliance
How Waste Connections is Using Data, Telematics, and AI
How do you manage and maintain more than 18,000 connected trucks? Data. Lots of it.
Read More →
Fleet Advantage: Top Logistics Fleets Outperform National Safety Benchmarks
Fleet Advantage's latest TRUST Safety Index found leading logistics fleets maintained significantly lower out-of-service rates and stronger safety scores than national averages, while highlighting persistent challenges related to tires, brakes, and unsafe driving behaviors.
Read More →
Why Fleet Data Matters More Than Ever at Waste Connections [Watch]
Waste Connections' Chuck Palmer explains how telematics, predictive maintenance, safety analytics, and AI help keep vehicles on the road and drivers safe in this episode of HDT Talks Trucking.
Read More →
Short Takes: How K&B is Using AI
Fleets need to "get on board the train" with AI, says Lance Evans of K&B Transportation in this HDT Talks Trucking Short Takes episode.
Read More →Short Takes: Inside K&B’s Truck Safety Tech
Listen to learn how K&B Transportation uses cellphone-blocking technology, speed management systems, weather geofencing, bridge avoidance tools, and more to improve driver safety.
Read More →
The Biggest Gap in Driverless Trucking Isn’t Tech. It’s Safety Validation
Nauto’s Stefan Heck says autonomous trucks are advancing quickly but proving they’re safe enough for large-scale deployment may be the industry’s hardest challenge.
Read More →
Truck Crash Rates Are Down. So Why Do Insurance Costs Keep Rising?
ATRI’s latest research points to litigation, social inflation, and soaring claims costs as key drivers behind record-high liability premiums for trucking fleets. But there are things motor carriers can do.
Read More →
FMCSA Removes More Than a Dozen ELDs from Registered List
The FMCSA continues its efforts to fight electronic logging devices that don't meet federal requirements, removing more than a dozen from the registered ELD list in May.
Read More →
How the Supreme Court Broker Liability Ruling Could Reshape Trucking’s Safety Landscape
The Supreme Court’s May 11 broker-liability ruling may not radically rewrite transportation law overnight. But industry experts say it will intensify pressure on brokers, carriers, and shippers to prove they are prioritizing safety.
Read More →
Recall of Fontaine Fusion Flatbeds Warns Owners Not to Use the Trailers
Some Fontaine Fusion flatbed trailer manufactured between February 2025, and March 2026 could have mainbeams weakened by hydrogen embrittlement because of a problem in the galvanizing process.
Read More →
