Seven GOP Lawmakers Signal Support for Hair-Testing Truckers
A letter signed by seven Republican Congressmen lays out their unequivocal support of a petition calling for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to allow hair testing in lieu of urinalysis to meet drug- testing requirements for truck-driver applicants.
David Cullen・[Former] Business/Washington Contributing Editor
A letter signed by seven Republican Congressmen lays out their unequivocal support of a petition calling for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to allow hair testing in lieu of urinalysis to meet federal drug testing requirements for commercial truck driver applicants.
The signatories, Reps. Rick Crawford; R-AR; Don Bacon, R-NE; Bruce Westerman, R-AR; Martha McSally, R-AZ.; Steve Womack, R-AR; French Hill, R-Ark., and Ted Budd, R-NC, contend that hair testing is “more reliable in identifying lifestyle drug users than the less expensive and less reliable urine exam” and that carriers should be allowed to use only hair testing, rather than being required to test applicants also via urinalysis.
Ad Loading...
The lawmakers acknowledged that the FAST Act highway bill had directed the Department of Health and Human Services to issue hair-testing guidelines, a necessary first step before FMCSA can start a rulemaking to allow hair testing alone, but they pointed out that bringing about such a rule “could take years.”
That’s why the signers said they “support the granting of this petition for exemption as soon as HHS issues its guidelines and before the FMCSA subsequently completes its rulemaking process that will formally adopt HHS guidelines that these petitioners are already meeting.”
“Hair testing is more reliable (albeit twice as expensive in identifying lifestyle drug users than the less expensive and less reliable urine exam,” the Congressmen stated, reiterating the argument made by the more than a dozen major national truckload carriers that have petitioned FMCSA to allow it in place of urinalysis.
“The companies will be able to utilize a single hair test, rather than requiring a job applicant to complete two tests-- a hair test and a urine exam,” the lawmakers added. Conducting only one test, the more reliable hair exam, will enable the carriers to collectively save more than $2 million each year.”
The petitioning carriers, as noted in the lawmakers’ letter, are: Knight Transportation, JB Hunt Transport, Maverick USA, Dupre' Logistics, KLLM Transport, Crete Carrier Corp., Shaffer Trucking, Werner Enterprises, FFE Transportation, US Xpress, Cargo Transporters, HUB Group, and Schneider National.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration issued more than 550 notices of proposed removal to commercial driver training providers following a five-day nationwide enforcement sweep. Investigators cited unqualified instructors, improper training vehicles, and failure to meet federal and state requirements.
Illinois is the latest state targeted and threatened with the loss of highway funding by the U.S. Department of Transportation in its review of states' non-domiciled CDL issuance procedures. The state is pushing back.
After a legal pause last fall, FMCSA has finalized its rule limiting non-domiciled commercial driver's licenses. The agency says the change closes a safety gap, and its revised economic analysis suggests workforce effects will be more gradual than first thought.
Listen as transportation attorney and TruckSafe Consulting President Brandon Wiseman joins the HDT Talks Trucking podcast to unpack the “regulatory turbulence” of last year and what it means for trucking fleets in 2026.
Safety, uptime, and insurance costs directly impact profitability. This eBook looks at how fleet software is evolving to deliver real ROI through proactive maintenance, AI-powered video telematics, and real-time driver coaching. Learn how fleets are reducing crashes, defending claims, and using integrated data to make smarter operational decisions.
Fleet software is getting more sophisticated and effective than ever, tying big data models together to transform maintenance, safety, and the value of your existing tech stack. Fleet technology upgrades are undoubtedly an investment, but updated technology can offer a much higher return. Read how upgrading your fleet technology can increase the return on your investment.