Safety Fitness Determination Changes: FMCSA to Hold Listening Sessions
Should the way motor carrier safety fitness determinations are made be updated? The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration is continuing to gather input on ideas for improvement.

The FMCSA is considering changes to its Safety Fitness Determination program, including using SMS data.
Image: HDT Graphic
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has scheduled an in-person listening session as it continues to gather information about possible changes to the way the agency rates motor carrier safety fitness.
FMCSA is contemplating changes to its Safety Fitness Determination process. Last year, the agency published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking asking for public input on changes to the system, including using SMS (Safety Measurement System) data.
Why Change Motor Carrier Safety Fitness Determinations?
Motor carrier safety fitness ratings of Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, and Conditional currently are determined by a compliance review, also called a DOT audit.
These look at existing motor carrier data plus data collected during the investigation and analyses it based on six factors:
General
Driver
Operational
Vehicle
Hazmat
Accident factor (recordable accident rate per million miles)
The process has been criticized because it’s resource-intensive and reaches only a small percentage of motor carriers.
In Fiscal Year 2019, FMCSA and its state partners conducted 11,671 compliance reviews out of a population of more than 567,000 active interstate motor carriers. Of those, 306 received a safety rating of Unsatisfactory, 1,842 were rated Conditional, and 2,701 were Satisfactory. (A small percentage of carriers with safety management control deficiencies are required to submit corrective action to continue operating and avoid a final unfit determination based on an unsatisfactory rating.)
Ditching the Three-Tier SFD Rating System?
One of the changes the agency is contemplating is moving to a single rating, only when a carrier is found to be Unfit, instead of the current three-tiered rating system.
The agency has said that a carrier getting a Satisfactory safety rating may be misconstrued as an FMCSA approval of the current operations of a motor carrier. But what it actually reflects is FMCSA’s evaluation of a motor carrier’s operations at the time of the investigation.
And under the current SFD process, a motor carrier with a Conditional rating is not prohibited from operating, even if a review reveals breakdowns in safety management controls in multiple areas.
The agency has long hoped to link its Compliance, Safety, Accountability program and its Safety Measurement System to fitness reviews. The SMS is FMCSA’s prioritization system to identify motor carriers for investigation, which went into effect in 2010.
But trucking companies have opposed the use of SMS to determine safety fitness, saying the SMS data has problems that need to be fixed first.
FMCSA's SMS currently is not used in any way to generate SFDs. SMS is FMCSA's prioritization system to identify motor carriers for investigation. SMS organizes inspection and crash data into seven categories of violations known as Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories (BASICs). These are commonly referred to as CSA scores, for the Compliance, Safety, Accountability program.
The Texas Listening Session
The June 29 public listening session will be held from 1-2:30 pm CDT in conjunction with the Texas Trucking Show in Houston. All comments will be transcribed and placed in the public docket for the regulatory action.
The agency wants to hear from members of the public on issues of concern relating to the current Safety Fitness Determination, including:
The three-tiered rating system (Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, Conditional) versus changing to a proposed single rating only when a carrier is found to be Unfit.
Using inspection data and FMCSA’s Safety Measurement System (SMS).
Incorporating driver behavior into SFD ratings.
Revising the list of safety violations used to calculate the rating.
Adjusting the weights allocated to particular violations, including increasing the weight for unsafe driving violations.
The meeting will be held at the NRG Center, 1 NRG Parkway, Houston, TX 77054, in the Seminar Area next to the Trucking Exhibition. Attendees do not need to preregister for the listening session but are required to register for the Texas Trucking Show at https://texastruckingshow.com/register.
FMCSA also said it is planning two virtual listening sessions on the same topics to be held in June and July.
The agency is accepting written comments to the docket through August 7, 2024.
More Safety & Compliance

Kodiak Lines Up Fleets for Driverless Trucking
An agreement for 75 trucks, a new Texas freight lane, and progress on safety validation move Kodiak closer to its planned driverless highway launch.
Read More →
More Trailer Data Through the Same Seven-Way [Video]
Can trucking’s standard seven-way connector handle more cameras and trailer data? Grote’s Adam Slade shows HDT how the company is using new technology with its 4See trailer system, not only to add a new backup camera but also to expand other capabilities — without adding another connection.
Read More →
PrePass Intelligence Mines Fleet Bypass, Toll and Safety Data
PrePass Intelligence helps fleets measure bypass savings, flag potential toll overcharges, and spot suspicious transactions by combining data from separate systems.
Read More →
Fatal Crash Exposes Toll Plaza Risks
An NTSB investigation found that last-minute lane changes and large speed differences at an Ohio toll plaza created a hazard the truck driver couldn't avoid in time.
Read More →
When Language Stops the Truck: The Return of ELP Out-of-Service Orders
English language proficiency rules for commercial drivers aren’t new, but renewed out-of-service enforcement has raised the stakes. Here’s what carriers need to know before a driver reaches a roadside inspection.
Read More →
A Camera Isn't a Safety Program. Here's What Brokers Are Screening for Now
Footage alone may not be enough to pass broker vetting processes. Here's what counts as a defensible safety program now.
Read More →
Marijuana and Trucking’s Drug-Testing Dilemma
Marijuana is getting stronger, laws are changing, and drug tests still can’t reliably establish impairment. What does that mean for truck drivers and the fleets that employ them?
Read More →
PrePass, Kodiak Connect Driverless Trucks to Roadside Enforcement
The system will allow enforcement agencies to verify Enhanced Inspection information and decide whether Kodiak’s autonomous trucks can bypass roadside screening sites.
Read More →
From One Generation to the Next: How Mentorship Builds Safer Truck Drivers
After three decades in trucking, Harold Perry shares what he's learned about driver safety, mentorship, and helping the next generation build confidence behind the wheel.
Read More →
FMCSA Pauses Biennial-Update Enforcement Amid Motus Transition
Carriers whose updates were due on or after June 1 have more time, while FMCSA works to stabilize its new registration system and warns of phishing sites impersonating its new carrier registration system, Motus.
Read More →

