Related: Rocket Science Circa 1995
Commentary: Gizmology Games
While driver-assisting technology is capable of making us safer, in reality it is rarely frustration free.

Rolf Lockwood

Rolf Lockwood
Two months back I acquired a new personal ride. My new SUV has as many advanced safety features as I could get, which was one of my key requirements. It’s only in the last couple of years that such tools — like active cruise control — have been offered on anything but very high-end light vehicles that ordinary mortals like me couldn’t afford. So I was excited.
I’ve been writing about such things in the trucking context for years now, so I wanted to have some of this gizmology to play with every day, not just occasionally on a test track in a truck. I also wanted to know — just how useful is this stuff?
I now have active cruise, forward-collision mitigation, blind-spot alerts, cameras pointing this way and that, everything but lane guidance. It’s been an enlightening experience, and it’s given me a new perspective on the high-tech truck from a driver’s perspective.
Every time I write something positive about electronic nanny aids like stability control, I hear from drivers and get various levels of outrage in return. We’re pros, they say, we’ve got the skills required, we don’t need the help.
They’re wrong, I believe, because no human can react as quickly as a computer, nor can any of us comprehend a situation as quickly as the growing number of sensors on our vehicles, big and small. Nor as accurately.
That doesn’t mean, however, that all this technology is frustration-free.
It’s hard to buy a car without electronic stability control nowadays, and I wouldn’t drive a truck without it.
But what about active cruise control? Well, it works, but it takes a lot of getting used to. I’m not there yet. I set the gap I want to maintain between myself and any vehicle in front of me, set the speed I want to drive, and off I go. Trouble is, if the speed differential is slight, if I’m going only 3-4 mph faster than the vehicle in front, the electro-trickery slows me down imperceptibly and the guy I just passed is suddenly on my tail – and annoyed. I hate drivers who can’t maintain a constant speed, but suddenly I’m one of the offenders.
My new SUV also came with a totally digital dash, which is in fact a totally awful dash. If ever there was a source of distraction on the road, this is it. I’m forced to push buttons on the steering wheel or the main touchpad – after first finding them — to see the tach. But if I have the tach showing I can’t also display my real-time fuel economy. Etc., etc. It’s a mess, and one of the worst examples of automotive design I’ve ever come across.
If I want to change the radio station or switch to a CD I have to take my eyes off the road and fool with that big touchpad, first selecting “entertainment” and then trying to find whatever it is I want on a screen full of choices — and finger smudges.
Yes, there are voice commands I could employ, but that demands very particular phrasing and, frankly, I don’t have the patience to figure it out.
I don’t think digital dashboards on trucks are quite this bad, but I’d love to hear about your experience with them.
I’d also like to know what was wrong with good old rotary dials and switches.
More Safety & Compliance

FMCSA Pauses Biennial-Update Enforcement Amid Motus Transition
Carriers whose updates were due on or after June 1 have more time, while FMCSA works to stabilize its new registration system and warns of phishing sites impersonating its new carrier registration system, Motus.
Read More →
ZF Expands Commercial Vehicle Push in North America
ZF is expanding its North American commercial-vehicle presence with new transmission applications, electrification, trailer technology and autonomous-driving systems.
Read More →
Truck Drivers Need More Than Another Alert
Fleets have more visibility into truck health, safety events, and driver activity than ever. The next challenge is turning all that information into useful guidance for the person who has to decide what to do next.
Read More →
Tesla Wants a Self-Driving Semi. Are Cameras Enough?
Could Tesla’s camera-only autonomous driving technology work on an 80,000-pound Semi? In this commentary, HDT's Deborah Lockridge takes a look at Tesla, Cybercab, and how autonomous trucks see the road.
Read More →
What DOT’s Automated Vehicle Strategy Means for Trucking
The U.S. Department of Transportation issued a new automated-vehicle strategy that outlines plans for driverless-truck regulations, cross-state freight corridors, and federal safety standards.
Read More →
NYC Expands Speed, Pedestrian Safety Tech Across Fleet
New York City is expanding intelligent speed assistance and pedestrian-alert systems across its municipal fleet, moving the technologies from pilot programs into vehicle procurement and retrofit requirements.
Read More →
FMCSA Removes 110 Truck Driver Training Schools from Certified ELDT List
Federal regulators also are targeting more than 160 additional training providers and launching a nationwide audit of third-party CDL skills testers as part of a broader crackdown on trucking fraud.
Read More →
Beyond DOT Compliance: What Makes a Trucking Fleet Truly Safe?
A trucking fleet can follow every rule and still make unsafe decisions. The real test comes when safety conflicts with freight, productivity, or cost.
Read More →
Hours of Service Pilot Programs: FMCSA Readies for 2027 Rollout
Two pilot programs could eventually reshape hours-of-service rules, giving truck drivers options to pause their 14-hour clock or use longer split sleeper rest periods.
Read More →
New Guide Offers Pet Safety Tips for Truck Drivers
Hundreds of thousands of pets travel in truck cabs. A new safety guide from Volvo Trucks and the Center for Pet Safety offers practical advice for truck drivers who bring dogs and cats along for the ride.
Read More →
