Heavy Duty Trucking Logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

NTSB Wants Tighter Rules for Autonomous Vehicle Tests

The National Transportation Safety Board is urging Congress and the state of Arizona to create a review process to make it safer when autonomous vehicles are tested on public roadways.

November 20, 2019
NTSB Wants Tighter Rules for Autonomous Vehicle Tests

NTSB Investigators examine the Volvo XC90 sedan involved in a fatal crash on March 18, 2018, while under Uber autonomous control.

Photo: NTSB

3 min to read


The National Transportation Safety Board is tapping the brakes on autonomous vehicle tests on public roads. On Nov. 19, the agency called on lawmakers to create a review process before allowing automated test vehicles to operate on public roads, based upon the agency’s investigation of a fatal collision between an Uber automated test vehicle and a pedestrian.

During a board meeting held to determine the probable cause of the March 18, 2018, Tempe, Arizona, crash, the NTSB said an Uber Technologies Inc. division’s “inadequate safety culture” contributed to the fatal collision between an Uber automated test vehicle and a pedestrian. The vehicle operator was uninjured in the crash; the pedestrian died.

Ad Loading...

According to NTSB's review of the accident, Uber’s Advanced Technologies Group modified the 2017 Volvo XC90 with a proprietary, developmental automated driving system. The vehicle’s factory-installed forward-collision warning and automatic emergency braking systems were deactivated during the operation of the automated system. An Uber ATG operator was in the driver’s seat, but the automated system was controlling the vehicle when it struck the pedestrian at 39 mph.

NTSB investigators determined that the immediate cause of the collision was the failure of the Uber ATG operator to closely monitor the road and the operation of the automated driving system, because the operator was visually distracted throughout the trip by a personal cell phone.

Contributing to the crash, the report said, was Uber ATG’s inadequate safety risk assessment procedures, ineffective oversight of the vehicle operators, and a lack of adequate mechanisms for addressing operators’ automation complacency – all consequences of the division’s inadequate safety culture.

“Safety starts at the top,” said NTSB Chairman Robert L. Sumwalt in a release. “The collision was the last link of a long chain of actions and decisions made by an organization that unfortunately did not make safety the top priority.”

The pedestrian’s impairment at the time of the crash, coupled with crossing outside a crosswalk, contributed to the crash, as did the Arizona Department of Transportation’s insufficient oversight of automated vehicle testing, the NTSB found.

Ad Loading...

Among the investigation’s findings:

  • The Uber ATG automated driving system detected the pedestrian 5.6 seconds before impact. Although the system continued to track the pedestrian until the crash, it never accurately identified the object crossing the road as a pedestrian – or predicted its path.

  • Had the vehicle operator been attentive, the operator would likely have had enough time to detect and react to the crossing pedestrian to avoid the crash or mitigate the impact.

  • While Uber ATG managers had the ability to retroactively monitor the behavior of vehicle operators, they rarely did so. The company’s ineffective oversight was compounded by its decision to remove a second operator from the vehicle during testing of the automated driving system.

  • Uber ATG made several changes to address the deficiencies identified, including implementation of a safety management system.

The NTSB issued a total of six recommendations to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the state of Arizona, the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, and Uber ATG. Among them, NTSB recommended that NHTSA require entities wishing to test a developmental automated driving system on public roads to submit safety self-assessment plans before being allowed to begin or continue testing and that NHTSA should review the plans to ensure they include appropriate safeguards.

More Safety & Compliance

SponsoredFebruary 1, 2026

Stop Watching Footage, Start Driving Results

6 intelligent dashcam tactics to improve safety and boost ROI

Read More →
Series graphic for 2025-2026 trucking trends
Safety & Complianceby Deborah LockridgeJanuary 28, 2026

6 Regulatory Changes for Trucking to Watch in 2026

After a year of what safety and compliance expert Brandon Wiseman calls “regulatory turbulence,” what should trucking companies be keeping an eye on in 2026 when it comes to federal safety regulations?

Read More →
Truck driver behind wheel with superimposed mobile driver assessment from Smith System
Safety & Complianceby News/Media ReleaseJanuary 27, 2026

Smith System Adds Digital Trainer Center Platform

A new Digital Trainer platform digitizes behind-the-wheel assessments, generates Smith5Keys driver scorecards, and connects safety training to ongoing driver risk management.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Safety & Complianceby StaffJanuary 26, 2026

Are You Using One of These Revoked ELDs?

Within a two-week period, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration removed eight ELDs from the list of registered electronic logging devices, but has since reinstated two of them.

Read More →
Safety & Complianceby Deborah LockridgeJanuary 22, 2026

What FMCSA’s New Enforcement Push Means for Fleets in 2026 [Video]

Last year was one of regulatory turbulence for trucking companies and truck drivers. Trucking attorney Brandon Wiseman breaks down the top DOT changes and what fleets should be aware of heading into 2026.

Read More →
SponsoredJanuary 19, 2026

3 New Ways Fleet Software Pays: ROI opportunities for modern fleet managers

Safety, uptime, and insurance costs directly impact profitability. This eBook looks at how fleet software is evolving to deliver real ROI through proactive maintenance, AI-powered video telematics, and real-time driver coaching. Learn how fleets are reducing crashes, defending claims, and using integrated data to make smarter operational decisions.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
SponsoredJanuary 19, 2026

Basic Tracking vs Next Generation Fleet Technology

Fleet software is getting more sophisticated and effective than ever, tying big data models together to transform maintenance, safety, and the value of your existing tech stack. Fleet technology upgrades are undoubtedly an investment, but updated technology can offer a much higher return. Read how upgrading your fleet technology can increase the return on your investment.

Read More →
Safety & Complianceby News/Media ReleaseJanuary 16, 2026

Netradyne Unveils Real-Time, Natural-Language Search for In-Cab Video

Netradyne says its Video LiveSearch enables real-time, natural-language search of in-cab video, allowing fleets to instantly surface the most meaningful footage for safety, coaching, and operations.

Read More →
An overhead view of a tractor-trailer traveling on a two-lane highway, with an inset showing a Garmin in-cab display and side-mounted camera view of a passing vehicle.
Safety & Complianceby News/Media ReleaseJanuary 13, 2026

Garmin Launches Dēzl DualView Blind-Spot Monitoring System for Truckers

Garmin expands its Dēzl lineup with a dual-camera system designed to improve blind-spot visibility for truck drivers.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Craig Piersma, Gentex
Safety & Complianceby Jack RobertsJanuary 12, 2026

Gentex Bets Big on Digital Glare Control as Headlights Get Brighter

Headlights are getting brighter. Gentex thinks new, digital in-cab technology can help.

Read More →