An independent panel evaluating the controversial cross-border trucking demonstration program says while there were no crashes involving Mexican carriers in the project and out of service rates were low, there were not enough participants for a meaningful comparison.
The panel found that the level of participation fell far short of what the DOT had projected, and that most of the demonstration trucks operated only within the border zone. Only 29 carriers, not the 100 that FMCSA projected, were granted long-haul operating authority during the 12 months to travel beyond the border commercial zone. Two of the carriers dropped out of the project, two of the remaining carriers never even crossed into the U.S., meaning only 25 Mexican carriers actually participated, operating about 100 trucks total.
The number of carriers participating "was too small for making statistical projections ... [about] the carriers who ... are likely to seek such long-haul operating authority in the future," the panel said. "To accurately assess the safety performance of carriers in the demonstration project, FMCSA would need a larger sample of Mexican carriers."
While more than 12,000 truck crossings were made into the U.S. by the participants during the 12-month period, less than 15 percent went beyond the border commercial zones.
There were no crashes involving the Mexico-domiciled trucks in the project. During the project, more than 7,000 safety inspections were conducted on the participating drivers and more than 1,400 on the participating trucks, in addition to the every-truck-every-time checks done at the border-crossing facilities. Less than 1 percent of the driver inspections results in out of service violations, which is lower than the rates of U.S.-domiciled carriers. The vehicle out-of-service rate of 8.7 percent was less than half the rate for all U.S. domiciled carriers.
The panel also noted that "there are far more Mexican carriers operating legally beyond the border commercial zone than ther were in the demonstration project -- 861 versus 27." These carriers operate under authority granted between 1982 and 1994. The percentage of vehicles placed out of service during roadside safety inspections for these "grandfathered" carriers was 24 percent, compared to just under 9 percent for the demonstration project carriers and 23 percent for all U.S. carriers. The mechanisms for checking the participants in the pilot program are more stringent than what is in place for the grandfathered carriers and their 1,700 trucks.
The panel's work verified that FMCSA implemented policies and regulations regarding admitting Mexico-domiciled carriers into the demonstration project, establishing safety mechanisms at the border, ensuring enforcement of safety rules by state enforcement officials, and carrying out the DOT's commitment to "check every truck and driver every time" they cross the border. (This is not an inspection, but rather involved a federal inspector checking a driver's license and checking the inspection decal on the truck to make sure it had been inspected within the last 90 days.)
The review did not examine security matters, environmental concerns, or customs and immigration issues.
You can download the entire report here: www.dot.gov/affairs/PanelReport.pdf
Independent Panel Finds Border Project Safe But Statistically Inadequate
An independent panel evaluating the controversial cross-border trucking demonstration program says while there were no crashes involving Mexican carriers in the project and out of service rates were low, there were not enough participants for a meaningful comparison
More Drivers

Mack Launches Digital Driver Guide for Chassis-Specific Truck Info
Mack’s new, virtual owner’s manual delivers VIN-based, on-demand guidance for vehicle systems via web, app, and soon in-cab displays.
Read More →
Western Star Showcases Truckers' Pride and Skill
Western Star is expanding its Star Nation Experience in 2026, adding new competitions and dealer participation to highlight operator skills and promote careers in trucking.
Read More →
Best Fleets to Drive For: Two Carriers Earn Overall Award for First Time
CarriersEdge announced the 2026 Best Fleets to Drive For overall winners, with Crawford Trucking, Fortigo Freight Services, and FTC Transportation receiving top awards.
Read More →
Federal Proposal Would Allow Pell Grants for Shorter-Term Job Training
The Department of Labor plans to expand Pell Grant eligibility to some shorter workforce training programs, a move the American Trucking Associations said will help strengthen commercial driver training schools and diesel technician training programs.
Read More →
Owner-Operator Model Gets Boost as DOL Proposes 2024 Independent Contractor Definition Reversal
For an industry that has watched this issue go back and forth for years, the independent contractor proposal marks the latest swing in the regulatory pendulum.
Read More →
FMCSA Reinstates Field Warrior ELD to Registered Device List
One electronic logging device has been reinstated to the FMCSA's list of registered ELDs.
Read More →
How One Company is Using Smart Suspension Technology to Reduce Driver Injuries and Improve Retention
America’s Service Line adopted Link’s SmartValve and ROI Cabmate systems to address whole-body vibration, repetitive strain, and driver turnover. The trucking fleet is already seeing measurable results.
Read More →
CarriersEdge Announces 2026 Best Fleets to Drive For
The 18th annual contest recognizing the best workplaces for truck drivers sees changes to Top 20, Hall of Fame
Read More →
FMCSA Targets 550+ ‘Sham’ CDL Schools in Nationwide Sting Operation
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration issued more than 550 notices of proposed removal to commercial driver training providers following a five-day nationwide enforcement sweep. Investigators cited unqualified instructors, improper training vehicles, and failure to meet federal and state requirements.
Read More →
DOT Alleges Illinois Issued Illegal Non-Domiciled CDLs
Illinois is the latest state targeted and threatened with the loss of highway funding by the U.S. Department of Transportation in its review of states' non-domiciled CDL issuance procedures. The state is pushing back.
Read More →
