Heavy Duty Trucking Logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

DOT Denies Carrier Requests to Keep Financial Data Private

Carriers that don’t want their financial and operating data made public will have to show more than “possible” harm, says the U. S. Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics

by Staff
March 14, 2000
3 min to read


Carriers that don’t want their financial and operating data made public will have to show more than “possible” harm, says the U. S. Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

Federal regulations require for-hire carriers with annual revenues of $3 million or more to report financial and operating data to BTS. The information, required since the days of economic regulation, is intended for a variety of government uses but is also available to the public, including shippers and other carriers. Many trucking companies see the requirement as little more than a way for customers and competitors to dig out otherwise private pricing and profit information.
One big user is Fredericksburg, VA based Transportation Technical Services which publishes the National Motor Carrier Directory and a variety of other directories and reports that rely heavily on the BTS data. Carriers do use the information, but mainly for benchmarking, says TTS’ Ron Roth. It can’t be used to calculate specific rates because the data is too generalized, too aggregated, he adds.
The government seems to agree. The 1995 ICC Termination Act transferred data collection responsibilities from the Interstate Commerce Commission to the BTS. It also created an exemption from public release of the data if a carrier could meet certain conditions. First, the carrier cannot be publicly held or otherwise subject to reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Second, confidentiality must be “necessary to avoid competitive harm and to avoid the disclosure of information that qualifies a trade secret or privileged or confidential information under the Freedom of Information Act.”
Last year 24 carriers requested exemptions, including five operations of Schneider National. BTS recently denied 20 of these requests, asked one carrier for more information, and gave Schneider a limited exemption.
Most of the petitioners claimed potential competive harm but failed to show how and what information might be used by competitors, the agency pointed out. Revenue and expense data are generalized across all customer and all commodities, and therefore unlikely to reveal rates or prices,” it said, citing a similar court ruling to back its argument.
Some argued that a relataively small number of customers account for the majority of their business, thus there is greater potential that the data might disclose rates. BTS agreed that the potential exists, but said those carriers didn’t provide enough information to prove their argument.
It did withhold a final decision on one carrier, Clarksville Refrigerated Lines, which runs a dedicated operation with one customer. In that case BTS agreed that disclosure could reveal sensitive information, but added that the carrier “didn’t state specifically what information is it is worried about and how that information would be used to its competitors’ advantage.”
Schneider, who has battled the reporting requirements for years, did win confidentiality on one point. It argued that competitors would be able to compare certain statistics to determine the impact of certain strategies, technologies or methods of doing business.
For instance, a competitor might be able to determine the cost and financial benefits of new trailer tracking systems by analyzing communications costs, number of trailers and other
data before and after the company began using the technology. BTS agreed and granted
confidentiality for some line items such as communications and utilities.
Roth calls it a “small victory” for data users but few expect the matter to end here. These carriers have 30 days to request reconsideration. Others may file now that the rules are clearer. Meantime, those data users want DOT to start enforcing the rules.
“At least Schneider is up front on this issue,” says Roth. “They have stated their opposition publicly, to DOT and in the courts. But there are a great number of motor carriers that don’t do anything.” TTS, in fact , estimates that there are 4,000 to 5,000 carriers large enough to meet filing requirements. Only about 1,500 to 1,700 actually submit reports.
A copy of the BTS decision is available through the DOT Dockets Management System. The docket number is BTS-99-5889.

More Drivers

Illustration of driver medical exam paperwork over duotone background of a blood pressure check

FMCSA Extends Paper Medical Card Exemption … Again

Five states still aren't ready to accept commercial driver medical exam information directly from the medical examiner's registry.

Read More →
Mack Pioneer tractor.
Driversby Jack RobertsApril 10, 2026

Mack Launches Digital Driver Guide for Chassis-Specific Truck Info

Mack’s new, virtual owner’s manual delivers VIN-based, on-demand guidance for vehicle systems via web, app, and soon in-cab displays.

Read More →
Close-up of Western Star truck logo with red star emblem on chrome grille, representing the brand’s identity in the trucking industry.
Driversby News/Media ReleaseApril 6, 2026

Western Star Showcases Truckers' Pride and Skill

Western Star is expanding its Star Nation Experience in 2026, adding new competitions and dealer participation to highlight operator skills and promote careers in trucking.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Photo of truck driver at podium holding award
Driversby News/Media ReleaseMarch 27, 2026

Best Fleets to Drive For: Two Carriers Earn Overall Award for First Time

CarriersEdge announced the 2026 Best Fleets to Drive For overall winners, with Crawford Trucking, Fortigo Freight Services, and FTC Transportation receiving top awards.

Read More →
Illustration of Department of Labor building, diesel technician at a computer, and driver training semi trailer
Driversby Deborah LockridgeMarch 10, 2026

Federal Proposal Would Allow Pell Grants for Shorter-Term Job Training

The Department of Labor plans to expand Pell Grant eligibility to some shorter workforce training programs, a move the American Trucking Associations said will help strengthen commercial driver training schools and diesel technician training programs.

Read More →
Illustration of truck owner operator and magnifying glass with the word "regulations"
Driversby Deborah LockridgeFebruary 26, 2026

Owner-Operator Model Gets Boost as DOL Proposes 2024 Independent Contractor Definition Reversal

For an industry that has watched this issue go back and forth for years, the independent contractor proposal marks the latest swing in the regulatory pendulum.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
 Truck with door open and enforcement officer talking to driver about ELD
DriversFebruary 26, 2026

FMCSA Reinstates Field Warrior ELD to Registered Device List

One electronic logging device has been reinstated to the FMCSA's list of registered ELDs.

Read More →
Photo of truck driver in yellow safety vest walking alongside tractor-trailer
Driversby Deborah LockridgeFebruary 25, 2026

How One Company is Using Smart Suspension Technology to Reduce Driver Injuries and Improve Retention

America’s Service Line adopted Link’s SmartValve and ROI Cabmate systems to address whole-body vibration, repetitive strain, and driver turnover. The trucking fleet is already seeing measurable results.

Read More →
Illustration with photos from some of the 2026 Best Fleets to Drive For honorees
Driversby News/Media ReleaseFebruary 24, 2026

CarriersEdge Announces 2026 Best Fleets to Drive For

The 18th annual contest recognizing the best workplaces for truck drivers sees changes to Top 20, Hall of Fame

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Illustration of driver students around trucks with distressed graphic elements and safety cones
Driversby Deborah LockridgeFebruary 19, 2026

FMCSA Targets 550+ ‘Sham’ CDL Schools in Nationwide Sting Operation

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration issued more than 550 notices of proposed removal to commercial driver training providers following a five-day nationwide enforcement sweep. Investigators cited unqualified instructors, improper training vehicles, and failure to meet federal and state requirements.

Read More →