Heavy Duty Trucking Logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Why Real-World Fuel Efficiency Numbers Don't Match up to Lab Tests

Real-life fuel consumption reduction numbers never live up to the numbers some tire makers tout when promoting fuel efficiency. One reason is that tire makers conduct their testing and evaluation under ideal conditions on test tracks to control as many variables as possible

Jim Park
Jim ParkFormer HDT Equipment Editor
Read Jim's Posts
August 31, 2011
2 min to read


Real-life fuel consumption reduction numbers never live up to the numbers some tire makers tout when promoting fuel efficiency. One reason is that tire makers conduct their testing and evaluation under ideal conditions on test tracks to control as many variables as possible.


According to Bridgestone, drivers, loads, trucks, trailers and test courses remain constant throughout a single test.

"If it's too windy, or too hot or too cold, or if it rains or snows, the day's testing is canceled," says Guy Walenga. "In the real world, you don't have the luxury of controlling everything, so the numbers are going to be different."

Michelin's Don Baldwin adds that driver habits, truck aerodynamics, tire pressure and engine maintenance are also significant factors in real-world fuel economy.

"A tire with higher rolling resistance will take more energy to move down the road. Choosing tires with lower rolling resistance and maintaining the pressure in those tires will save fuel," he says. "The percentage of the total will depend on how the other factors are controlled. We have calculators that will predict the effect of the tires based on rolling resistance, including how rolling resistance evolves over the life of the tire. This effect is always taking place, even if it is difficult to see because other factors are not being controlled."

Another reason the numbers don't always add up is apples-to-oranges comparisons. A half-worn, non-fuel-efficient tire may actually be almost as fuel-efficient as a brand-new low-rolling-resistance tire. Tires are at their least efficient when the tread is new and deep. As tread wears away, the rolling resistance improves. While one might be tempted to run, say, a three-month comparison between in-service tires and new fuel-efficient tires, the results might not do justice to the fuel-efficient tire.

The best way to evaluate fuel-efficient tires is over their life cycle - including acquisition cost and casing credit, miles-per-thousandth of tire life, and fuel consumption improvements between the baseline vehicle and the test vehicle, Bridgestone advises.

"Bearing in mind that not all SmartWay-approved tires will yield the same performance, you will save more money on fuel with a low-rolling-resistance tire than you will give up in tire life," says Goodyear's Larry Tucker. "When we did those calculations, fuel was still at $2 a gallon."

From the June 2011 Issue of Heavy Duty Trucking

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

More Fleet Management

Greg Feary, president and managing partner of transportation law firm Scopelitis, Garvin, Light, Hanson & Feary.
Fleet ManagementMay 27, 2026

What Trucking Fleets and Brokers Need to Know About This Supreme Court Case

In May, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that freight brokers can be held liable for damages if a truck they have contracted with is involved in an accident. Transportation attorney breaks down the ruling and its implications for the trucking industry.

Read More →
Illustration of hacker and information network
Fleet Managementby Ben WilkensMay 22, 2026

The Trucking Industry’s Threat Intelligence Gap

The trucking industry has no shortage of cybersecurity reports and cargo crime statistics. What it lacks is timely, operational intelligence that fleets can actually use.

Read More →
Illustration of rising costs with truck in background

Truck Crash Rates Are Down. So Why Do Insurance Costs Keep Rising?

ATRI’s latest research points to litigation, social inflation, and soaring claims costs as key drivers behind record-high liability premiums for trucking fleets. But there are things motor carriers can do.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ATA Truck Tonnage April 2026

ATA Truck Tonnage Holds Steady in April at Highest Levels Since 2022

ATA’s For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index was unchanged in April after a strong March gain, with freight volumes remaining at their highest levels since late 2022.

Read More →
Greg Feary, president and managing partner of transportation law firm Scopelitis, Garvin, Light, Hanson & Feary.
Fleet Managementby Jack RobertsMay 20, 2026

Behind the SCOTUS Broker Ruling Part 1

Transportation attorney Greg Feary breaks down the recent Supreme Court decision that brokers can be held liable for damages in truck accidents and what it means for the trucking industry going forward.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ACT Research preliminary trailer orders April 2026.

ACT Research: Trailer Orders Continue Upward Surprise in April

Preliminary net trailer orders rose 3% from March and jumped 126% year over year, signaling stronger-than-expected demand despite typical seasonal softness.

Read More →
DAT Freight Volume April 2026

DAT: Fuel Surcharges Drive April Truckload Rate Gains as Freight Volumes Slip

Truckload spot and contract rates climbed in April. But DAT says higher fuel costs -- not stronger freight demand -- were behind most of the increase.

Read More →
Graphic with light bulbs, HDT Truck Fleet Innovators logo, and the word Nominations
Fleet ManagementMay 15, 2026

Deadline Extended for HDT Truck Fleet Innovators Nominations

Heavy Duty Trucking has extended the deadline for nominations for its Truck Fleet Innovators awards. The deadline has been extended to May 22.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Illustration of U.S. Supreme Court building and a truck crash

Supreme Court Ruling Puts Freight Broker Vetting Practices in Spotlight

The unanimous SCOTUS ruling in the closely watched Montgomery v. Caribe case allows state negligence claims against freight brokers that hire unsafe motor carriers, raising new liability and vetting concerns among brokers.

Read More →