
We have a measure in Congress proposing to give truck and bus owners tax credits for putting advanced safety devices on their equipment. It's about time.
A measure in Congress proposing to give truck and bus owners tax credits for putting advanced safety devices on their equipment.


We have a measure in Congress proposing to give truck and bus owners tax credits for putting advanced safety devices on their equipment. It's about time.
The bill would amend the Internal Revenue Code and reward carriers for using technology such as collision and lane departure warning systems, stability controls and brake stroke monitoring. Called the Commercial Motor Vehicle Advanced Safety Technology Act, it applies to trucks rated at 26,000 pounds and up.
It would grant a corporate income tax credit equal to half the cost of a qualified safety system, up to $1,500. Maximum credit per vehicle would be $3,500, and a fleet would be limited to a total $350,000 credit per year. It would expire at the end of 2012.
Qualified safety systems could be put on new trucks or retrofitted. Manufacturers would have to certify the system is right for the vehicle, and installers would have to certify that any retrofits work. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration would have the authority to add other systems to the qualified list.
It's a sensible, compact package, and it didn't just come out of thin air. The Heavy Duty Manufacturers Association and its parent, the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association, worked with Rep. Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) to draft and introduce the bill.
As it was being drafted, an ingenious HDMA and MEMA ride-and-drive demonstration at Robert F. Kennedy stadium - right in the politicians' backyard - gave legislators and federal agencies a first-hand look at the effectiveness of the safety systems. A dozen manufacturers showed safety and energy technologies to a crowd of about 150. It was great strategy, and couldn't help but impress some powerful politicos.
The bill, H.R. 3820, was championed by Thompson, but it has bipartisan support. Four other Democrats and three Republicans signed on to its introduction. They are: Ron Lewis (R-Ky.); Heath Shuler (D-N.C.); Steve LaTourette (R-Ohio); Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.); Sander Levin (D-Mich.); Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.), and Mike Rogers (R-Mich.).
Just one crash can ruin a fleet - especially a small fleet that may not have deep pockets. Studies by FMCSA put the average cost of a heavy truck wreck at $166,000 for property damage and injuries. If there's a fatality involved, the average leaps to some $3.5 million.
Safety technology works. Just ask innovators like U.S. Xpress, Maverick, Boyle Transportation and Saia Motor Freight, whose use of the systems has more than paid for them in accident prevention.
But it's tough for a lot of truck buyers to shell out the extra bucks. They opt to roll the dice and not buy, betting they'll be free of serious accidents. Tax credits would make the systems more affordable, and buyers would benefit further from savings on accidents they don't have.
But this is far from a slam-dunk. There will be a government analysis of how much the bill's tax credits will cost the treasury, and whether the loss can be covered elsewhere, such as a budget cut in another program. There's a long waiting line for those kinds of monies.
It is critical that all elements of the trucking community be on board with a clear-cut, ringing endorsement of this legislation. It is also critical that it be kept simple. If other items are hung on it - like retroactivity, more devices or tax breaks for other types of systems - it will likely be a dead duck.
If you think this is pushing Big Brother on the industry, consider that it is a financial incentive, still giving buyers an option. Keep in mind, there are plenty of people around - with power of their own - who would love to see the government require this equipment.
The bigger picture that Congress must see is that injuries and deaths will be prevented by passage of this bill. Unfortunately, the monetary savings those accident reductions will bring to society won't be part of the cost justification equation. That's not how the system works.
Regardless, this is win-win legislation. Congress needs to get it done.

E-mail Doug Condra at dcondra@truckinginfo.com, or write P.O. Box W, Newport Beach, CA 92658.
How a former commercial vehicle enforcement officer turned director of safety at K&B Transportation is embracing real-world safety technology.
Read More →
When the unexpected happens, how you react to, and deal with operational blind spots is critical. Here’s how to keep you recovery on track, when nothing is normal.
Read More →
As fleets adopt artificial intelligence for routing, maintenance, and load matching, new security risks are emerging. Learn where the vulnerabilities are and how to put the right controls in place.
Read More →
The long-awaited registration system promises a single portal — and tighter fraud controls.
Read More →
CargoNet reports fewer supply chain crime events to start 2026. But losses hold steady as organized crime shifts tactics toward impersonation schemes and high-value goods.
Read More →
Heavy Duty Trucking is searching for forward-looking leaders at trucking fleets as nominations for HDT’s Truck Fleet Innovators 2026. Deadline is May 15.
Read More →
Cargo theft rings plant operatives as drivers inside legitimate, fully vetted carriers, then execute coordinated thefts that look like a traditional straight theft from the outside.
Read More →
A modest sequential increase capped the strongest quarterly performance in years, signaling continued freight momentum in early 2026.
Read More →
More than 300 carriers across 26 states have been sent to collections as the Ohio Turnpike cracks down on toll evasion and delinquent payments.
Read More →
The American Transportation Research Institute will examine driver coaching, regulatory impacts — including the "Beyond Compliance" concept —and weather disruptions that shape trucking operations.
Read More →