Heavy Duty Trucking Logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Dispatchers and Overtime: Forty Miles of Bad Road

The latest threat to the transportation industry is not rising fuel costs or clogged highways, but rather, the inevitable wave of lawsuits by dispatchers claiming that they are entitled to overtime pay

by Guest Commentary Mark E. Tabakman, Esq., Fox Rothschild
December 15, 2009
Dispatchers and Overtime: Forty Miles of Bad Road

 

3 min to read


The latest threat to the transportation industry is not rising fuel costs or clogged highways, but rather, the inevitable wave of lawsuits by dispatchers claiming that they are entitled to overtime pay.

Such lawsuits have the potential to be exceptionally dangerous since transportation employers typically classify dispatchers as exempt from overtime and then require the employees to work well over 40 hours in a week. Although the employer may treat dispatchers as exempt, the employee(s) may still claim they are entitled to overtime pay because they are misclassified. This is a serious problem because federal law imposes very harsh penalties on employers who fail to properly pay overtime.

Employees can prosecute these claims through the Department of Labor. Or, worse for employers, they can file suit in federal and/or state court, claiming overtime for themselves and other dispatchers with the company -- the dreaded class action. In the past several years, there have been a number of such class actions filed by dispatchers against motor coach companies. I have defended a number of these dispatcher overtime claims, and although I have been successful, the decisions could have just as easily gone against the employer.

The cost of losing an overtime claim is steep for employers. Under federal law, an employee may recover unpaid overtime, liquidated damages in an amount equal to the unpaid overtime (i.e. double damages) and attorneys' fees. If the Department of Labor uncovers even a single violation, it may conduct an audit of all dispatchers or the entire company. The limitations period runs two years prior to the date the complaint is filed (counting backwards), except in the case of a willful violation when it is extended to three years.

If the employer goes to trial and loses, it must pay the attorneys' fees for the plaintiffs, which could total $100,000 or more. This stark fact puts tremendous pressure on employers to settle cases, especially if the evidence of exempt status is not persuasive. The only employer defense is that the employees are exempt under one of two federal law exemptions.

The first defense, the executive exemption, applies to any individual employed in a supervisory capacity. Generally, truck dispatchers' primary duty is the routing of drivers and trucks, not managing a department, and would thus lack sufficient management authority. The authority to hire and/or fire is essential for the executive exemption. If dispatchers do not have the authority to hire or fire drivers, and lack authority to make other "change of status" determinations, they are (again) not exercising management duties. Although dispatchers may have the authority to write employees up or document infractions of company policy, if the discipline is decided upon by the terminal manager, safety manager, etc., this will not be considered sufficient supervisory authority to meet the exemption.

The second defense is that the dispatchers are exempt under the administrative exemption. This defense hinges on whether the employee's duties involve the "exercise of discretion and independent judgment." This means evaluating options and then making decisions. If dispatchers only follow standardized procedures, then a court will likely find that the employees do not exercise discretion and are therefore non-exempt. As one can imagine, it is highly subjective and fact intensive analysis.

The danger is real; the threat exists. Yet, through proactive strategizing, an employer may endow dispatcher employees with the requisite duties, responsibilities and freedom of action (i.e. discretion and independent judgment) that will qualify them for exemption under the FLSA and state laws. The real danger lies in doing nothing and waiting for the time bomb to explode, because it will.

Mark Tabakman is a partner in the Labor & Employment Department at Fox Rothschild, www.foxrothschild.com. He has a specialty in wage-hour law and has defended numerous class (and single plaintiff) overtime actions under the Fair Labor Standards Act and various state laws, including individual and class actions by dispatchers. You can reach him at mtabakman@foxrothschild.com.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

More Fleet Management

2026 Mack Anthem rolls off the assembly line
Fleet Managementby News/Media ReleaseFebruary 3, 2026

Mack Financial Services Launches Physical Damage Insurance For All Makes

Mack Financial Services has introduced the Rolling Asset Program, offering physical damage insurance for all makes and models within a customer's fleet.

Read More →
Illustration of phishing email with trucks in background
Fleet Managementby News/Media ReleaseFebruary 3, 2026

New Phishing Scheme Targets Motor Carriers, FMCSA Warns

Beware of a new phishing scheme targeting motor carriers. Scammers are sending emails posing as FMCSA or DOT officials to steal data.

Read More →
Daimler-Class8 partnership.
Fleet Managementby News/Media ReleaseFebruary 2, 2026

DTNA Partners with Class8 to Expand Digital Services for Freightliner Owner-Operators

A new partnership brings free wireless ELD service plus load optimization and dispatch planning tools to fourth- and fifth-generation Freightliner Cascadia customers, with broader model availability planned through 2026.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
SponsoredFebruary 1, 2026

Reducing Fleet Downtime with Advanced Diagnostics

This white paper examines how advanced commercial vehicle diagnostics can significantly reduce fleet downtime as heavy duty vehicles become more complex. It shows how Autel’s CV diagnostic tools enable in-house troubleshooting, preventive maintenance, and faster repairs, helping fleets cut emissions-related downtime, reduce dealer dependence, and improve overall vehicle uptime and operating costs.

Read More →
SponsoredFebruary 1, 2026

Stop Watching Footage, Start Driving Results

6 intelligent dashcam tactics to improve safety and boost ROI

Read More →
M&A illustration with Werner and FirstFleet logos
Fleet Managementby Deborah LockridgeJanuary 29, 2026

Werner Expands Dedicated Fleet Nearly 50% With FirstFleet Acquisition

The $283 million acquisition of FirstFleet makes Werner the fifth-largest dedicated carrier and pushes more than half of its revenue into contract freight.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Bobit Business Media B2X Rewards.
Fleet Managementby News/Media ReleaseJanuary 29, 2026

Bobit Business Media Launches B2X Rewards Engagement Program

B2X Rewards is a new, gamified rewards program aimed at driving deeper engagement across BBM’s digital platforms, newsletters, events, and TheFleetSource.com.

Read More →
Trucking Trends series graphic
Fleet Managementby Deborah LockridgeJanuary 29, 2026

AI is Reshaping Trucking in 2026, from the Back Office to the Shop

Trucking’s biggest technology shifts in 2026 have one thing in common: artificial intelligence.

Read More →
Column graphic illustration with Deborah Lockridge head shot and a small fleet truck in the background
Fleet Managementby Deborah LockridgeJanuary 27, 2026

Why Small Trucking Fleets Are Still Standing [Commentary]

Why discipline, relationships, and focus have mattered more than size for smaller trucking fleets during the freight recession.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Fleet Managementby Deborah LockridgeJanuary 23, 2026

Cargo Theft Is Surging. A Bill in Congress Could Help. [Video]

Cargo theft losses hit $725 million last year. In this HDT Talks Trucking Short Take video, Scott Cornell explains how a bill moving in Congress could bring federal tracking, enforcement, and prosecutions to help address the problem.

Read More →