Related from the HDT archives:
Frustrated Customers Sue Cat Over Acert Failures (2010)
Some Cleaner Diesels Unreliable, Expensive, Say Fleet Execs in TMC 'Report Card’ (2012)
Caterpillar has reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit over allegedly defective ACERT EPA 2007-compliant engines, with owners of these engines eligible to receive $500 to $10,000 per engine.

Caterpillar touted its unique ACERT technology as the answer to EPA 2007 emissions regs. HDT file photo by STF

Caterpillar touted its unique ACERT technology as the answer to EPA 2007 emissions regs.HDT file photo by STF
Caterpillar has reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit over allegedly defective ACERT EPA 2007-compliant heavy-duty diesel engines, with owners of affected engines eligible to receive $500 to $10,000 per engine.
The class action suit was a consolidation of a number of other lawsuits against the company, which exited the on-highway engine business in 2009.
Customers alleged in the suit that Cat’s EPA 2007-compliant C13 and C15 engines (manufactured in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009) would lose horsepower and shut down.
The engines were branded ACERT, for Advanced Combustion Emissions Reduction Technology. The settlement announcement refers to the problem technology as the CAT Regeneration System (CRS).
The aftertreatment equipment was unique in that its exhaust-gas recirculation (EGR) system piped cleansed gas back to the inlet system to keep intake air clean. EGR cools combustion temperatures to reduce production of nitrogen oxide, a smog causer.
But the system, and its series-turbochargers and other devices, proved troublesome, said fleet managers in this case as well as in numerous sessions at meetings of the American Trucking Associations Technology & Maintenance Council.
Caterpillar denies the allegations but has said that to litigate the case further "would be risky and costly for both sides.”
"Caterpillar … endorses the settlement class as a realistic resolution of this class action," the company said in its motion for court approval of the settlement.
"Given the uncertainties and costs of continuing litigation, the proposed settlement is the best way to end the uncertainty and delay, and most importantly, will ensure fair compensation to Caterpillar customers who may not have received expected value from their product."
The settlement includes U.S. original purchasers or original lessees, subsequent purchasers or subsequent lessees of a vehicle powered by one of the affected engines. It establishes a $60 million settlement fund. All class members who submit a valid claim will be eligible to receive a pro rata share of the fund according to the following guidelines:
A. Class members who experienced no CRS related repairs are eligible to receive (but not guaranteed) $500 for each engine.
B. Class members who experienced one to five qualified CRS related repairs are eligible to receive (but not guaranteed) $5,000 per engine.
C. Class members who experienced six or more qualified CRS related repairs are eligible to receive (but not guaranteed) $10,000 per engine.
Instead of seeking a payment as set forth in B. or C. above, each eligible class member that experienced at least one CRS related repair has the option to seek to claim losses up to a maximum of $15,000, experienced as a consequence of qualified CRS related repairs. These losses can include, but aren't limited to, towing charges, rental charges, and hotel charges. Those pursuing this option are not eligible to seek payment under A, B, or C.
Payments to eligible claimants may be adjusted pro rata (up or down) depending on the number of eligible claims filed and the total amount of the settlement fund available to pay claims.

For fleet managers and collision repair professionals keeping heavy-duty trucks on the road, getting the color right the first time isn't just about appearance — it's about efficiency, turnaround time, and bottom-line results. Discover how today's digital color tools are transforming the repair process from guesswork to precision.
Read More →
DTNA is recalling more than 2,400 trucks that received an incompatible software fix instead of the hardware repair required to address brake valve corrosion.
Read More →
Fleets have more visibility into truck health, safety events, and driver activity than ever. The next challenge is turning all that information into useful guidance for the person who has to decide what to do next.
Read More →
Making it through August isn’t the same as being ready for the next several months of operation. Find out what systems may have suffered from summer heat and need to be checked out before fall.
Read More →
With freight improving but costs still climbing, fleet maintenance executives explain how they're balancing price, quality, and supplier relationships.
Read More →
The nearly 6,000 Kenworth and Peterbilt trucks in the recall could potentially lose engine power, among other things.
Read More →
The new API PC-12 heavy-duty engine oil category reflects the changing demands of modern diesel engines. But fleets like Foodliner are looking to getting their own data before making decisions on adopting the new oils and questions such as extending oil drain intervals.
Read More →
Commercial vehicle inspectors are focusing on truck brakes during CVSA's Brake Safety Week, August 23-29.
Read More →
On the recalled vehicles, manufacturing variations can cause the battery interconnect cable to contact the auxiliary stud and hold down the bracket.
Read More →
The joint venture will operate MCT's network of Carrier Transicold dealerships and mobile service locations, with the companies promising greater service capacity and uptime for refrigerated fleets.
Read More →