What do you know about the synthetic web strapping you use to secure cargo? What you need to know is that it has a label, tag or stencil showing the manufacturer's name and/or trademark, and the working load limit of the strap in pounds or kilograms. You've got all that? The label even says the strap is DOT approved. You're good to go, right?
Guess what? There are no DOT standards for cargo strapping.
Synthetic-Web Strapping Under Scrutiny
What do you know about the synthetic web strapping you use to secure cargo? What you need to know is that it has a label, tag or stencil showing the manufacturer's name and/or trademark, and the working load limit of the strap in pounds or kilograms. You've got all that? The label even says the strap is DOT approved. You're good to go, right? Guess what? There are no DOT standards for cargo strapping

Testing demonstrated that even minor cuts in the sides of the tested straps caused failures at much lower tension than expected.
The FMCSA's cargo securement rules incorporate by reference manufacturing standards for certain types of tiedowns -- including synthetic webbing -- developed by the Web Sling & Tie Down Association. That group describes its own manufacturing standard as more of a guide than a requirement. The following caveat appears on page two of the Web Sling & Tiedown Association's Recommended Standard Specification for Synthetic Web Tiedowns:
This recommended standard specification has been formulated as a guide to users, industry and government to ensure proper use, maintenance and inspections of synthetic web tie down assemblies. The existence of this recommended standard specification does not, however, prevent members of the Web, Sling, & Tie Down Association, Inc. and other manufacturers from manufacturing or selling products not conforming to this standard.
"It's ironic; you can't buy a $10 lamp in this country that doesn't have an Underwriter's Laboratory (UL) approval sticker on it, but there's no policing of the cargo securement product sold to the trucking industry," says Ralph Abato, vice president of sales and marketing for Ancra International.
Abato has raised the issue of cargo strap quality with enforcement officials, and he has provided test data showing some of the commercially available product falls alarming short of its indicated working strength.
"The biggest issue is the influx of importers and local sellers of strap assemblies that don't meet any standards at all," Abato says. "They either don't understand the standards or don't care. They don't do any testing, and they put out vastly inferior product that's basically mislabeled."
On top of that, when it comes to enforcing the cargo securement rules, inspectors tend to take the rating labels and tags at face value, he says. "They're looking for compliance with the total number and working load limit (WLL) of the tie down devices. They rarely question the integrity of the straps' rating."
Strap condition
In 2009, Abato brought some documented cargo strap testing to officials' attention that shows, among things, that straps might be more prone to abrasion and crushing damage that originally thought. The testing also demonstrated that even minor cuts in the sides of the tested straps caused failures at much lower tension than expected.
Ten samples of new, commercially available 4-in. cargo strapping rated at 20,000 pound breaking strength were intentionally damaged (minor damage) in repeatable ways and then subject to a destructive pull test. The undamaged samples all exceeded the rated breaking strength in a preliminary test.
With an edge cut of 10 percent of the width of the strap (about a quarter of an inch), the average breaking strength was 47.4 percent of the new breaking strength. Actual breaking tension ranged from 9,368 pounds to 9,480 pounds out of 20,000.
Simulated abrasion testing revealed the test straps failed at 69.5 percent of the rated breaking strength. The straps all ruptured at the point the strap had been damaged.
In a combination test, with simulated abrasion and a 10-percent edge cut, the straps survived only 15 alternating cycles of a full working load limit pull test, failing at an average of 29.6 percent of the 20,000-pound breaking strength, or just 5,924 pounds.
Abato says he has not yet heard from CVSA on how it might proceed, armed with this information, but he expects there will be another round of testing done to verify the previous tests.
It's certainly cause for concern, but not panic. CVSA is looking at the issue of edge damage to cargo straps, and is contemplating a tightening of the standards. The key take away-here is to use quality strapping from a reputable manufacturer, make sure it's properly marked, and keep in it good condition.
Read more about cargo securement in the June issue of HDT.
More Safety & Compliance

Aperia Expands Halo Platform with Steer-Tire Inflation System, Fifth-Wheel Integration
Aperia Technologies introduced a new automatic tire inflation system for steer axles and a partnership with Fontaine Fifth Wheel to integrate coupling status into its Halo Connect platform.
Read More →
Fleetworthy and HAAS Alert Expand Partnership Stopped Truck Protection Alerts
Fleetworthy and HAAS Alert expanded their partnership to deliver real-time digital alerts that warn motorists when commercial trucks are stopped roadside and notify truck drivers when approaching emergency responders.
Read More →
New Entrants, Chameleon Carriers, and Safety: Is It Too Easy to Start a Trucking Company?
More than 100,000 new trucking companies enter the industry each year, but regulators manage to audit only a fraction of them. That churn creates opportunities for inexperienced startups — and for “chameleon carriers” that shut down after safety violations and reappear under new identities. Read more from Deborah Lockridge in this commentary.
Read More →
Mack Introduces Mack Protect Collision Mitigation System for MD Series
Mack Trucks has expanded its proprietary Mack Protect collision mitigation platform to the Mack MD Series, bringing heavy-duty safety technology to medium-duty trucks operating in urban and regional environments.
Read More →
Smarter Maintenance Strategies to Keep Trucks Rolling
In today’s cost-conscious market, fleets are finding new ways to get more value from every truck on the road. See how smarter maintenance strategies can boost uptime, control costs and drive stronger long-term returns.
Read More →
Bison Transport, Mill Creek Motor Freight Win TCA Fleet Safety Awards Grand Prize
Two Canadian fleets earned the Grand Prize in the Truckload Carriers Association’s 2025 Fleet Safety Awards, recognizing the industry’s top safety performance based on accident frequency and safety programs.
Read More →
CVSA Issues New Inspection Guidance on ELD Tampering, False Logs
New guidance for commercial vehicle inspectors distinguishes between more traditional logbook violations and tampered ELD data that can result in mandatory 10-hour out-of-service orders.
Read More →
FMCSA Reinstates Field Warrior ELD to Registered Device List
One electronic logging device has been reinstated to the FMCSA's list of registered ELDs.
Read More →
Daimler Truck North America Adds 360-Degree Exterior Camera System to Vocational, Medium-Duty Trucks
Daimler’s new factory-installed system integrates side and forward-facing cameras with in-cab touchscreen to improve jobsite visibility and reduce upfit complexity.
Read More →
Kodiak Integrates HAAS Alert’s Safety Cloud into Autonomous Trucking Platform
Kodiak has integrated HAAS Alert’s Safety Cloud platform into its autonomous vehicle control system to send real-time digital hazard alerts to nearby motorists.
Read More →
