Safety & Compliance

Report: Truck Speed Limiters Improve Highway Safety in Ontario

June 27, 2017

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe

Speed-related, at-fault collisions involving large commercial vehicles fell by a whopping 73% after mandatory speed limiter legislation took effect in Ontario, according to a recent study by the Ontario Ministry of Transportation.

The year-long study conducted between 2014-2015 examined data from pre- (2006-2008) and post- (2010-2012) speed limiter legislation by using fatal, injury and police reported property damage collisions on high-speed highways. It also looked at MTO enforcement officers’ large vehicle driver speed data, among other real-world data.

The Ontario Trucking Association, a strong proponent of mandatory speed limiters, said that although speed limiter opponents believed slowing down large trucks would lead to a dangerous speed differential and cause more collisions with passenger cars and other vehicles, the study concluded there is no evidence that has happened. “Moreover, the study also dispelled the myth that in a speed limiter environment, drivers adjust their driving behavior to compensate for any perceived time lost as a result of driving slower,” the OTA said in a release.

The percentage of truck drivers struck in the rear stayed the same from pre- to post legislation (10.03 % of total collisions 2006-2008 and 10.47% 2010-2012), while the rate increased for other drivers (18.6% 2006-2008; and 21.3% 2010-2012).

Going forward, the study suggests some recommendations to raise compliance and realize the full benefits of the speed limiters, including increased enforcement and enhancing the electronic control module readers available to enforcement officials.

The study could give ammunition to supporters of a proposed speed-limiter rule in the U.S. that appears to be stalled.

After a decade-long push by trucking and safety advocates, last August the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration jointly proposed a rule that would require that heavy-duty vehicles be equipped with speed-limiting devices — but did not lay out what speed they should be limited to. Final comments on the proposal were due on Dec. 7, and more than 5,400 comments were filed.

The fate of the speed limiter proposal is unclear under the less-regulation focus of the Trump administration. Shortly after taking office in January, President Trump issued an executive order calling for killing two existing rules for every new federal rulemaking.

One trucking coalition was quick to lobby Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao to prioritize the speed limiter proposal for the regulations chopping block (along with the electronic logging device mandate). Signing that letter were the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, the National Association of Small Trucking Companies, and stakeholder groups, such as the National Pork Producers Council and the Petroleum Marketers Association of America.

On the other hand, the Alliance for Driver Safety & Security (aka the Trucking Alliance) also wrote to Chao, urging her to proceed with a number of safety initiatives, including the speed limiter proposal, saying it “strongly believes that excessive large truck speeds are critical factors in the severity of injuries and fatalities in large truck accidents.” The Alliance “supports a truck-speed limiter rule in which the maximum speed setting is no more than 65 mph.”


  1. 1. Steve [ June 28, 2017 @ 03:40AM ]

    Yeah, Like any government agencies are going to say that anything they have done is Wrong. According to a Realist

  2. 2. Lorie [ June 28, 2017 @ 05:37AM ]

    I would love to see crash comparisons for all types not just a four wheeler running into the back of a semi. It is proven when car drivers are delayed they do stupid things like unsafe passing, speeding, cutting in front of trucks so they are not behind them. What are the crash statistic comparisons for all types of crashes? There is a lot more than just crash history to monitor when cutting the speed of trucks. Road Rage; Traffic jams, etc.

  3. 3. James [ June 28, 2017 @ 06:50AM ]

    If split limits were a great idea wouldn't California's crash stats provide all the data needed for the proponents of speed limiters to prove their case?

  4. 4. John Baxter [ July 01, 2017 @ 07:52AM ]

    I'm suspicious of such results. One wonders if car-car crashes then increase. But, my concern is the inflexible nature of most speed limiter proposals. Sometimes, the right speed is 55, sometimes 65, and at times even 75 is safe. If you are going to implement limiters, at least design them to adjust to the highway and the conditions, and provide a minute or so of flexibility so we don't end up with hundreds of traffic-frustrating turtle races.


Comment On This Story

Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.


We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.


ELDs and Telematics

sponsored by
sponsor logo

Scott Sutarik from Geotab will answer your questions and challenges

View All

Sleeper Cab Power

Steve Carlson from Xantrex will answer your questions and challenges

View All