Article

Fuel Smarts: Opposed-Piston Diesels About Five Years Away

Truck users can look forward to 30% better fuel economy at 10% lower production cost, says Achates Power

September 2014, TruckingInfo.com - Department

by Tom Berg, Senior Contributing Editor - Also by this author

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe
An OP can be configured and packaged to fit the vehicle it’s intended for. For trucks, the cylinders are likely to be vertical or slanted. Photo: Achates Power
An OP can be configured and packaged to fit the vehicle it’s intended for. For trucks, the cylinders are likely to be vertical or slanted. Photo: Achates Power

Security’s tight at Achates Power Inc. in San Diego, where you don’t just walk into the light-industrial building and expect a tour of the labs — something common where R&D is under way. Before getting beyond the lobby, I had to prove that I’m an American citizen by showing my USA-issued passport.

One of Achates’ clients is the U.S. Army, which has the company’s engineers working on an opposed-piston engine design for possible use in a Hummer-like light/medium-duty utility truck. The military consumes huge quantities of fuel, and much of that has been in distant war zones, like Afghanistan, where fuel has to be shipped in at great expense. It believes the OP engine may be an answer.

An OP engine has two pistons per cylinder, facing each other, and a central combustion chamber. Explosive fuel burn pushes the pistons apart and their connecting rods twist separate crankshafts at each end of the cylinder. Through pulleys and gears, the crankshafts transfer their power to a single output shaft. Ports in the cylinders allow entry of air and expulsion of exhaust gases, and pistons compress and fire every time they meet — a two-stroke design, made famous by General Motors and Detroit diesels starting in the 1930s. Like them, an Achates OP has no intake or exhaust valves, but no heavy cylinder heads, either.

The relatively simple OP design promises a substantial increase in fuel economy — about 30% better than current conventional piston engines, say Achates executives and engineers.

Moreover, they say their OP diesels will meet current and future emissions limits and cost 10% less to manufacture. In contrast, a government-sponsored study concluded that a 23% fuel economy improvement would cost the buyer of a traditional engine about $23,000, says David Johnson, Achates’ president and chief executive officer.

Such financial advantages have the attention of commercial interests, including Fairbanks Morse Engine, a long-time builder of opposed-piston diesels for transportation, industrial, marine and military use. FM, which sells diesel and dual-fuel OP engines, wants the refinement that Achates people are applying to the 80-year-old concept.

No, the opposed-piston concept is not new. The 30% fuel-savings figure was established in the mid 1930s by Junkers of Germany in its Juno 205 OP aircraft engine, Johnson explained.

Achates, co-founded by an aircraft designer and an engineer, began modernizing the OP concept in 2004. It has assembled a team of highly trained and experienced engineers performing intricate design work.  They’ve got engines running on test stands, and are working slowly and deliberately to be sure they’re getting every advancement right.

For example, engineers are designing a wrist pin bearing with a contour that reduces friction while still standing up to constant pounding as it transfers power toward the crankshafts. Conventional piston engines have those parts, but how they work in OP engines is subtly different, Johnson said. Of course modern OP diesels have electronic controls. And to further meet emissions limits, an OP diesel uses exhaust-gas recirculation and exhaust aftertreatment devices, but needs less equipment.  

One principle responsible for an OP engine’s high efficiency is its large amount of piston travel versus bore size, a ratio of 2.4 to 1, explained Johnson and James Lemke, Achates’ co-founder and chief scientist. Another is the central combustion chamber, which works comparatively slowly and gets multi-metered fuel from two injectors. These reduce heat rejection and use more of a fuel’s energy compared to conventional engines with their single piston and combustion chamber per cylinder.

Brake-thermal efficiency of a 4.9-liter, three-cylinder/six-piston Achates OP diesel now being tested is 47.8%, compared to typical BTEs in the high 30- to low 40% range for conventional midrange diesels. The best current 15-liter truck engine is the Cummins ISX, with 43.4% BTE, but Achates is projecting 51.5% BTE for an engine of comparable power. (A 50% BTE target is one of the goals of the U.S. Department of Energy's SuperTruck program, and so far only one of the research teams developing demo trucks has surpassed that.)

In addition, an OP diesel can burn many fuels, and will readily handle natural gas with just a 1% shot of diesel as the ignition agent.

An Achates heavy truck engine of 11 to 13 liters in displacement will produce 400 to 600 horsepower and 1,475 to 1,625 pounds-feet, Johnson says. An extra port in each cylinder will enable engine braking at similar levels. A heavy-duty engine will have three cylinders and six pistons, but with a larger bore and stroke than that 4.9-liter light-truck engine’s.

The smaller engine, being tested on a dynamometer stand for the military, has horizontal cylinders with accessories cantilevered at various points. But an OP can be configured and packaged to fit the vehicle it’s intended for. For trucks, the cylinders are likely to be vertical or slanted. Without cylinder heads, it’ll sit low in the chassis, allowing a low hood and nose to reduce air drag and improve driver visibility. With reduced heat rejection, the radiator can be relatively small and fit in that small nose.

The Achates team expects to have engines running in trucks in about three years, Johnson said. In five years they’ll probably be in production. Achates, though, won’t build them; instead it will license its patented technology for combustion, piston design, cylinder cooling and air handling to established engine companies who can use existing facilities to produce them. “We’re in touch with just about everybody in the world” who makes engines, Johnson said.

Comments

  1. 1. Doug Hobbs [ October 17, 2014 @ 05:39AM ]

    check this out

  2. 2. Arthur Goodman [ October 26, 2014 @ 12:50PM ]

    Fairbanks-Morse made this type of engine for locomotives in the early 1940s and also for submarines.

  3. 3. Rafael Cassali Camozzato [ December 12, 2014 @ 05:11AM ]

    reviving an JUMO205 with todays tech is just outstanding. I can imagine from small cars through trucks and airplanes application for these engines.

  4. 4. wasif [ April 21, 2017 @ 02:45AM ]

    yesterday i was studying about the IC Engines in a text book and i thought exactly same concept to replace the existing engine, now i am amazed scientist other then me are also working on the same thing, so means this work is already done.
    Here is my question this engine is an oppose engine what if there are two vertical oppose piston and two horizontal oppose piston are install in same cylinder i wonder how much power it will produce with same amount of fuel

 

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

Newsletter

We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.

GotQuestions?
sponsored by
sponsor logo

ELDs and Telematics

Scott Sutarik from Geotab will answer your questions and challenges

View All
GotQuestions?

Sleeper Cab Power

Steve Carlson from Xantrex will answer your questions and challenges

View All