Safety & Compliance

Driving With the Wingman Collision Avoidance System

June 2010, - Feature

by Tom Berg, Senior Editor, Senior Editor - Also by this author

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe
Think of any rear-end accident you've ever seen or heard of, where a truck slams into a stopped or slower-moving vehicle. What was its cost in injuries, lives and property damage?
An arc of red lights along the top of the speedometer and an audible beeping alert the driver when something's too close up ahead. (Photo by Volvo)
An arc of red lights along the top of the speedometer and an audible beeping alert the driver when something's too close up ahead. (Photo by Volvo)
Chances are it was far, far more than the $2,100 or so that truck builders charge for optional active/adaptive cruise control - the type that modulates the throttle as required by traffic just ahead and applies brakes when a collision is likely. This technology could prevent many such wrecks and reduce the severity of others.

Most truck original equipment manufacturers offer this technology. International, Kenworth, Peterbilt, Mack and Volvo offer Bendix's Wingman. This piggybacks onto a truck or tractor's electronic anti-lock braking and anti-rollover systems. By federal regulation, ABS is standard, and anti-rollover is either optional or standard, depending on the OEM. Volvo and Mack road tractors are standard with Bendix Roll Stability Control, and the next step is the Wingman option.

Volvo calls it Volvo Enhanced Cruise, and I tried it out recently on a VNL tractor on North Carolina Interstates. A front-facing radar antenna sent microwaves into our travel lane to "see" traffic. A microprocessor took the return signals and judged whether we were closing on any objects up ahead.


It didn't save me from a wreck, because I was awake and alert enough to slow down when needed, but I got a good look at how it works. This trip near Greensboro, N.C., was led by Ed Saxman, Volvo's powertrain expert who was instructing me on the tractor's updated I-Shift automated mechanical transmission (a story for another time).

The Wingman system intervened several times when motorists cut in front of us, sounding a visual and audio alarm until they moved ahead. The visual alarm was an arc of red lights that lit up along the top of the speedometer, and the audible was a beep-beep-beeping that got my attention without annoying me.

Another time it applied the brakes. I had moved out of I-40's right lane to make room for traffic entering from a ramp. That put me on a collision course with a slow-moving pickup, whose driver was doing only about 55 to 60 in a 70-mph zone in the center lane. But Wingman saw the silver Chevy Silverado and braked us down to a matching speed while sounding and flashing the alarms. I waited for an opening in the right lane, swung back there, accelerated and went around him, and that was that.

Bendix Wingman will brake a truck almost to a halt if need be. I got to experience that a year earlier, during the Mid-America Trucking Show, in a Mack Vision tractor on I-65 and I-265 near the Kentucky fairgrounds. Adaptive Cruise Control, as Mack calls the system, slowed us to a near-stop on an off-ramp as we approached a Bendix-operated test car that purposely got in our way. Service brakes took us down to a crawling speed maintained by the engine as it idled through an Allison automatic transmission. To come to a full stop, I gently touched the brake pedal.

On this recent run in the Volvo, the I-Shift tranny changed its ratios to suit our cruising, slowing and speeding up as traffic and my foot's pressure on the accelerator dictated. Power would've cut off if I'd have pressed on the "gas" when something ahead was too close, which I didn't. But the dethrottling capability is there, along with the automatic braking function, to back up a driver who might be too tired or distracted to react appropriately to a situation.

Would Wingman or something like it have prevented that driver from rear-ending the car driven by a well-known congressman's wife on the Beltway outside Washington, D.C., a few months ago? Maybe. It happened in stop-and-go traffic when the truck's cruise control would probably have been switched off and its automatic braking deactivated. But the audio-visual alarms would've alerted the truck driver that he was about to hit the car, and he might've braked in time. If I ran the fleet that owned the truck, I'd be spec'ing active cruise control on my next order.

From the June 2010 issue of Heavy Duty Trucking.


  1. 1. Deb Huddlestun [ August 21, 2013 @ 09:23PM ]

    You think this is so great why don't you try running team down I 35 from Dallas to Laredo and see how annoying it is and distracting not to mention that when the alarm goes off it wakes your co-driver up so no one is getting any rest.

  2. 2. Thomas burke [ December 05, 2013 @ 03:08PM ]

    the system needs to be refined. after a year of driving the VEC its faults are glaring. in heavy high speed traffic around the capital beltway in DC it goes off non stop if car see any daylight they cut you off.. and the gap opens wider and the VEC slows you down to the point were your truck is now a rolling hazard. it should
    only be activated when the cruize is on .

  3. 3. bill paulhamus [ January 24, 2014 @ 08:07PM ]

    try driving one of these thing in NYC it will drive you nuts its hours of being yelled at by you mother in law for hours and hours on end

  4. 4. RW [ June 18, 2014 @ 07:53AM ]

    Why are we so dead set on taking humanity out of Trucking? If you don't have the skill set to operate safely then you shouldn't be in the truck and they should stop trying to take measures to cover that. it's kind of like automatic transmissions and trying to make the dash and all be like a car. Especially Volvo. I'd love to fly a fighter jet but I don't see them taking steps to make it possible for me to just crawl in one and take off and I don't want them to.

  5. 5. RW [ June 18, 2014 @ 08:01AM ]

    I've been driving 27 years and have no accidents this thing is more of a distraction then it is a help.

  6. 6. Dan Dundon [ July 10, 2014 @ 06:12AM ]

    I am a freelance writer and am interested in hearing about truckers who have driven with this system. I want the good and the bad. Please e-mail me with your thoughts.

  7. 7. Seymour buttz [ April 25, 2015 @ 12:45PM ]

    Ive been driving with it for 11 days and traffic times of the day I have to park it stress makes the head pound nose bleed and ears throb........gonna have long term affEcts on the health of our drivers

  8. 8. myra bumgart [ May 03, 2015 @ 01:40PM ]

    Alarm noise is our (teams) only main complaint.....There is no way a co-driver can sleep with the alarm going off 24/7...and the only time you can drive without it going off is at 2 am in the desert because we cannot control other drivers actions and automobile drivers refuse to honour the space requirements that this program seems to believe we have in this perfect scenario world they think we operate in...and our shop director told some of our team coworkers that...he didn't give a damn how tired they got or if they ever got any sleep..that they were gonna have to just deal with it"..the near constant beeping is creating stressed out, hostile, road raging drivers....sounds to me that this problem is defeating the attempt to increase safe driving..

  9. 9. james waite [ August 17, 2015 @ 04:03PM ]

    The constant noisy chirping alarm is aggravating me into road rage. The system slams on the brakes at the most inconvenient time. When roads are icy and this system slams on the brakes the way it does there is going to be more deaths. All it does is cause more stress and fatigue on the drivers.

  10. 10. rob [ August 19, 2015 @ 05:38AM ]

    Anybody know how to turn the wingman system off there has to be a way. The constant chirping is to much.

  11. 11. Jon [ November 09, 2015 @ 11:47PM ]

    It is the most annoying distraction I have ever encountered. It wastes fuel slowing down to match the speed of slower moving cars. It beeps continually in heavy traffic and hits the breaks at what it thinks is a problem. By the end of the day it has created an extremely stressful experience.

    The brochure gives bs made up stories of how it saved the life of someone by alerting the driver or applying the breaks. It never talks about the poor guy behind you that nearly ass ends you because a stupid computer slammed on the breaks. It is a dangerous fuel consuming piece of junk that give stupid drivers a false sense of safety.

    I expect to see drivers over driving poor visibility conditions because they believe it alert them in time.

    News flash, as much as you would like to believe that you drive my truck better from your computer terminal with a flawed program that can't distinguish between normal and critical situations than i can from tje drivers seat it is not possible. This system will kill people.

    As a side note I did increase my fuel milage by .5 mpg from 6.6 to 7.1 when I disabled the adaptive cruise. I also decreased my stress level greatly. I do not recommend the wingman or the on guard systems and can't wait to get rid of this truck.

  12. 12. Jon [ November 09, 2015 @ 11:53PM ]

    Pull the fuse for the adaptive cruise. You will have a check light on and 2 error codes but its worth it. Standard cruise still works. It was fuse #67 in my truck. I drive a 2016 730 Volvo.


Comment On This Story

Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.


We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.



The expert, Mark Betner from CITGO, will answer your questions

View All



The expert, Rence Oliphant from Hendrickson, will answer your questions

View All