Drivers

New Rule Issued over Some Truck Movements at Train Tracks

September 24, 2013

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration are set to publish a joint final rule Wednesday in the Federal Register regarding the transportation of hazardous materials as part of an effort to reduce crashes at railroad crossings.

Photo: Rennett Stowe, from USA, via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Rennett Stowe, from USA, via Wikimedia Commons

It prohibits drivers transporting certain hazardous materials from entering onto a highway–rail grade crossing unless there is sufficient space to drive completely through the grade crossing without stopping. There are more than 21, 000 such crossings in the U.S.

This action comes nearly 20-years after Congress passed the Hazardous Materials Transportation Authorization Act of 1994, and was amended last year in the nation’s highway funding authorization.

Both agencies published a notice of proposed rulemaking in January 2011.

FMCSA and PHMSA say they expect 2.62 fewer crashes per year, when all states adopt rules compatible with this Federal rule and 0.3 fewer train derailments. Both estimate the total annual benefits from crashes avoided to be approximately $946,000, consisting of $473,000 in reduced injuries, $1,800 in reduced hazardous material spills, $33,000 in reduced highway property damage, and $438,000 in reduced costs for train derailments.

The American Trucking Associations along with a public safety organization and other groups, asked both FMCSA and PHMSA to require states and local jurisdictions to post signs at the nation’s grade crossing that did not have ample distances, but both agencies said they do not have such jurisdiction.

The new regulation takes effect 30 days after publication.

Comments

  1. 1. rob pines [ September 24, 2013 @ 11:49AM ]

    So where is the rule the Stockholm syndrome struck railroaders not get on trains with no brakes and steering and drive like idiots on these short dynamic storage space crossings? Just another way to word f--k the law to cover railroad butt.

  2. 2. freddie [ September 25, 2013 @ 08:48AM ]

    It's common sense driving to stop when carrying hazmat cargo at all rail crossings, and not to cross if you cannot clear the tracks. It was the law and company policy for the places i was leased to for the last 40 years. Its nothing new. except to the new drivers who need gps to get where they are going, cause they cannot read a atlas or map or do a trip plan.

  3. 3. Scott [ September 27, 2013 @ 09:23AM ]

    In the "estimate the total annual benefits" was the cost to the trucking industry calculated at all? Wherever you stand on potential crashes avoided, there is a real cost in time and fuel to re-route and avoid the newly banned crossings.

 

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

Newsletter

We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.



GotQuestions?

LUBRICANTS

The expert, Mark Betner from Citgo will answer your questions
Ask a question

Sponsored by

Magazine