L.A. May Ban Port Companies that Misclassify Drivers
The Los Angeles City Council voted unanimously on Dec. 12 to investigate a ban of trucking and warehousing companies that break local, state, and federal employment laws from operating on city property.
Steven Martinez・Web Editor
December 13, 2017
Photo: Port of Long Beach
2 min to read
Photo: Port of Long Beach
The Los Angeles City Council voted unanimously on Dec. 12 to investigate a ban of trucking and warehousing companies that break local, state, and federal employment laws from operating on city property.
The motion directs City Attorney Mike Feuer to submit a written report advising the City of Los Angeles on what options it has to mandate fair wages and working conditions for companies servicing the Port of Los Angeles. The report is also to determine if the city’s land use laws can be used to deny access to port property of companies that have repeatedly violated state and federal employment laws in a similar manner to how the city responds to nuisance activities.
Ad Loading...
The motion specifically targets companies that have been accused of denying drivers fair wages, rights, and benefits by not classifying them as full employees, which groups like Justice for Port Truck Drivers characterize as driver misclassification.
In the official summary of the City Council’s motion, it makes reference to the controversial USA Today report that described the plight of certain drivers working at the Ports of L.A. and Long Beach who took home little pay and worked long hours just to pay off their truck leases.
That story has been challenged by port trucking companies and stakeholders that claim that USA Today exaggerated the extent of the problem, cherrypicking stories for their extremeness and ignoring the majority of drivers who have made the independent contractor business model work.
The City Council’s summary stated that since 2010, at least 1,150 port truck drivers have filed claims in civil court or with the labor commission against these trucking companies. It further states that judges have sided with drivers 97% of the time.
Council Member and Committee Chair Joe Buscaino stated that it was "unacceptable for companies to profit on city property while exploiting human beings." The motion was sponsored by Council Members Buscaino, Bob Blumenfield, and Mike Bonin.
For an industry that has watched this issue go back and forth for years, the independent contractor proposal marks the latest swing in the regulatory pendulum.
America’s Service Line adopted Link’s SmartValve and ROI Cabmate systems to address whole-body vibration, repetitive strain, and driver turnover. The trucking fleet is already seeing measurable results.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration issued more than 550 notices of proposed removal to commercial driver training providers following a five-day nationwide enforcement sweep. Investigators cited unqualified instructors, improper training vehicles, and failure to meet federal and state requirements.
Illinois is the latest state targeted and threatened with the loss of highway funding by the U.S. Department of Transportation in its review of states' non-domiciled CDL issuance procedures. The state is pushing back.
After a legal pause last fall, FMCSA has finalized its rule limiting non-domiciled commercial driver's licenses. The agency says the change closes a safety gap, and its revised economic analysis suggests workforce effects will be more gradual than first thought.
Listen as transportation attorney and TruckSafe Consulting President Brandon Wiseman joins the HDT Talks Trucking podcast to unpack the “regulatory turbulence” of last year and what it means for trucking fleets in 2026.
