Federal Court Rules Against XPO in Driver Misclassification Case
A federal district court judge has issued a judgment in favor of five port and rail truck drivers against XPO Cartage in a driver misclassification lawsuit, awarding the drivers nearly $1 million in reimbursement and legal fees.
by Staff
May 24, 2017
Photo: Port of Long Beach
2 min to read
Photo: Port of Long Beach
A federal district court judge has issued a judgment in favor of five port and rail truck drivers against XPO Cartage in a driver misclassification lawsuit, awarding the drivers $958,660 in reimbursement plus attorney's fees and costs.
The California Labor Commission had previously issued awards to the five drivers following hearings that found they had been misclassified as independent contractors. XPO Cartage appealed those five decisions in California Superior Court and the case was moved to Federal court. Attorneys for the Labor Commission defended the decisions on behalf of the drivers.
Ad Loading...
After a four-day bench trial and post-trial briefing, Judge William Keller of the U.S. Central District Court of California ruled the cases were not preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 and that all five drivers were entitled to reimbursement for expenses and deductions owed to them as full employees of XPO Cartage.
The driver misclassification issue is driven by drivers serving the ports who are classified as independent contractors but due to restrictions explicitly or implicitly enforced on them, are unable to realistically work for another company and do not own their own equipment. Because they are not technically employees of the companies they work for, in some cases drivers are not able to access basic benefits that regular employees are legally entitled to.
"The United States District Court's decision in this case vindicates the rights of five employees who have sought for years to recoup the deductions unlawfully withheld from their wages due to being misclassified as independent contractors," said California Labor Commissioner Julie A. Su. "My office is dedicated to ensuring workers are paid what they are due under the law and ensuring workers are properly classified."
For an industry that has watched this issue go back and forth for years, the independent contractor proposal marks the latest swing in the regulatory pendulum.
America’s Service Line adopted Link’s SmartValve and ROI Cabmate systems to address whole-body vibration, repetitive strain, and driver turnover. The trucking fleet is already seeing measurable results.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration issued more than 550 notices of proposed removal to commercial driver training providers following a five-day nationwide enforcement sweep. Investigators cited unqualified instructors, improper training vehicles, and failure to meet federal and state requirements.
Illinois is the latest state targeted and threatened with the loss of highway funding by the U.S. Department of Transportation in its review of states' non-domiciled CDL issuance procedures. The state is pushing back.
After a legal pause last fall, FMCSA has finalized its rule limiting non-domiciled commercial driver's licenses. The agency says the change closes a safety gap, and its revised economic analysis suggests workforce effects will be more gradual than first thought.
Listen as transportation attorney and TruckSafe Consulting President Brandon Wiseman joins the HDT Talks Trucking podcast to unpack the “regulatory turbulence” of last year and what it means for trucking fleets in 2026.
