Requiring trailers to contribute toward reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and fuel use is beyond the legal authority of the Environmental Protection Agency, said Jeff Bennett, vice president for engineering and product development at Utility Trailer Manufacturing, during a webinar sponsored by FTR Associates on Feb. 15.
His company and an industry association argued in their comments on the proposals that the Clean Air Act limits the EPA to powered vehicles, not trailers. EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration published their Phase 2 proposals last year, and they’re now pondering thousands of comments on them from trucking and other interested parties.
“EPA overstepped its authority because trailers are not motorized vehicles,” Bennett said, “and there’s no legal basis for regulating trailers.” Utility and others in the industry are now waiting for EPA’s response to that and other responses to the proposed rules. But most continue to support EPA’s voluntary SmartTruck program that also aims to cut GHG emissions and raise fuel economy.
EPA and NHTSA also greatly overestimated average highway speeds for trailers, Bennett said. The agencies claim in their Phase 2 proposals that trailers cruise at 65 mph 86% of the time, at 55 mph 9% of the time and 5% at other speeds. Data given to Utility by three major fleets show that traffic congestion, delays at loading docks, and time parked in yards and terminals limit average speeds to much lower levels.
“So 65 mph is not realistic,” Bennett said.
Furthermore, EPA proposals would affect all box-type trailers – a one-size-fits-all approach that is flawed because it assumes that all trailers cruise at steady highway speeds, he said. Long-haul fleets sometimes do, and can benefit from low-rolling-resistance tires and aerodynamic improvers (the current and future method of meeting government targets for fuel economy and carbon dioxide reduction.)
But short-haul and regional fleets do not benefit, Bennett said. They run at low speeds and face frequent delays where that special equipment does no good, and where it can be damaged in everyday service. For example, low-rolling-resistance tires do not wear well in urban service and must be replaced prematurely.
“Hopefully they will cooperate with us on that,” he said of agency officials.
Meanwhile, “EPA wants environmentally safer foam insulation for reefers, a greener formulation, and they want it by 2020,” he said. But developing a replacement for urethane foam is difficult. “We have been environmentally conscious throughout our history,” he said of Utility Trailer, “and if we had it, we would already be using it.”
See all comments