Editor in Chief, Deborah Lockridge

Editor in Chief, Deborah Lockridge

As the federal government continues to struggle with how to fund the nation’s highway system, many states have been grappling with the same question. Some have raised fuel taxes. Others have turned to tolls or creative funding mechanisms.

In some states, part of that debate includes truck size and weight. One of those is Michigan, where some want to roll back the state’s unique regulations allowing “Michigan trains.”

“We have to re-educate our representatives as these events come up from time to time,” says Jim Burg, a former HDT Truck Fleet Innovator.

Owner of Michigan-based James Burg Trucking, operating about 90 tractors pulling steel and other flatdeck freight, he’s an advocate for regulations allowing bigger, heavier trucks. I talked to him about why, and he has some good arguments:

1. More axles protect roads

One of the key arguments against heavier trucks is damage to roads. But if you spread the weight over multiple axles, it causes less damage than regular tractor-trailers.

In numerous studies, Burg says, “In every instance when you compare gross vs. axle weight, it is axle weight that causes road damage.”

Michigan’s truck-weight law is designed to control axle loads instead of gross vehicle weight. A standard tractor-trailer carrying 80,000 pounds may have four axles carrying 17,000 pounds each plus 12,000 on the steer axle. A Michigan train may have 164,000 pounds spread over 11 axles – carrying only 13,000 pounds each.

Two standard rigs carrying 160,000 pounds on 10 axles cause about 60% more pavement damage than the single heavier truck, Michigan says, because of the higher axle loadings and the extra weight of a second tractor.

Burg explains it this way to his golfing buddies: “What’s going to do more damage on a green – you walking in your golf shoes, or your wife walking across it in high heels?”

2. They aren’t more dangerous

Opponents contend that heavier trucks need additional stopping distance and could cause more damage in a crash. Supporters say heavier seven-axle trucks are actually safer, because more axles means more brakes.

“We have more brakes. We have frankly just a safer vehicle all around,” Fred Corrigan, executive director of the Aggregate & Ready Mix Association of Minnesota, told the St. Cloud [Minn.] Times. And he pointed out that some western states that already allow 105,000-pound trucks are looking to increase those limits, something they wouldn’t likely do if they were unsafe.

And if more efficient trucks mean fewer trucks on the road, that’s fewer vehicles to get into crashes.

3. They help economic growth

Michigan and nearby states have suffered the loss of manufacturing to cheaper labor overseas. To keep or attract manufacturing back to U.S. shores, the steel, aluminum and other goods used to make manufactured goods needs to be available at an affordable price. Efficient, affordable transportation is part of that, Burg points out.

And that, of course, has an effect on all the industries and businesses that serve those manufacturing plants, including trucking.

4. It’s good for the environment

As the focus of the Environmental Protection Agency has shifted from tailpipe emissions to greenhouse gases, the term “freight efficiency” has come into play. Burg says his trucks went from getting 6.9 mpg on 80,000-pound rigs to 6.3 mpg at 120,000 pounds – “nearly double the payload for a fraction of the fuel consumption.”

5. It addresses the driver shortage

Not enough drivers? Heavier trucks mean fewer trucks and fewer drivers are needed to move the same amount of freight.

“We can increase our revenues and therefore pay our drivers more, because we’re moving more freight in the same truck,” Burg says. “You certainly can attract a better quality person because the job pays more.”  

About the author
Deborah Lockridge

Deborah Lockridge

Editor and Associate Publisher

Reporting on trucking since 1990, Deborah is known for her award-winning magazine editorials and in-depth features on diverse issues, from the driver shortage to maintenance to rapidly changing technology.

View Bio