Few truck drivers feel they are harassed by their employers or shippers, and drivers who use electronic logs experience no more harassment than those who use paper logs.

Those are the key findings of a survey by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration in response to concerns that harassment will increase under the pending electronic logging device mandate.

“The evidence in this survey research does not support concluding that harassment occurs due to being in a situation where [hours of service] are logged using ELDs,” the agency said.

The agency conducted the survey as part of its preparation for an ELD mandate that is expected next year. The rule will require most drivers to eventually switch from paper to electronic logs. It will set standards for the devices and the supporting documents that regulators need to confirm compliance, as well as protect drivers from harassment.

The research was triggered specifically by a 2011 court ruling that said the agency needed to consider the possibility of harassment under the ELD mandate.

The agency surveyed and interviewed drivers and carriers, asking about the type and frequency of their interactions. The drivers were given a list of 14 kinds of interactions that could be considered harassment, and were asked how they viewed them.

Fewer than 30% of the drivers considered any of the interactions to be harassment, and 42% said none of them were.

The interactions most likely to be considered harassment were interruption during off-duty time (28%), asking the driver to work when he felt tired (28%) and asking the driver to falsify his logs in order to work longer or delay a break (26%).

“Few drivers experience regular interactions with their carriers that they consider to be harassment,” the agency said.

For instance, 7% of the drivers had their off-duty time interrupted two or more times a month, and 1% reported being asked to change their log in order to work longer.

The carrier interviews backed up the drivers’ perception that harassment is not widespread, the agency said.

For instance, 5% of the carriers said that on average they ask a fatigued driver to work once a month, and 2% said they do it twice a month.

Perceptions of harassment were generally the same no matter which logging method the driver used. There were differences in perceived harassment between paper logs and ELDs, but they were not statistically significant, the agency said.

“Two percent of drivers experienced an interaction that they considered to be harassment and that they associated with the HOS-logging capabilities of the ELD.”

The agency found that drivers on electronic logs do have different experiences in some respects. They are more likely to be paid for customer delays, and to have management ask customers to adjust schedules for the driver’s sake.

But the ELD drivers also were more likely to be required to wait between loads for more than two hours without pay, and to be interrupted when off-duty.

The survey found drivers generally are positive about the way ELDs can cut their paperwork, but some believe the devices reduce their independence and give management too much information about how they spend their time.

About the author
Oliver Patton

Oliver Patton

Former Washington Editor

Truck journalist 36 years, who joined Heavy Duty Trucking in 1998 and has retired. He was the trucking press’ leading authority on legislative and regulatory affairs.

View Bio