TopNews

ATA: Keep NAFTA’s Mexican Truck Proviso to Curb Border Congestion

October 2, 2017

By David Cullen

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe
Photo: México Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes
Photo: México Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes

UPDATED: In no uncertain terms, the American Trucking Associations has made it clear it continues to support the provision within the North American Free Trade Agreement that allows approved Mexico-based motor carriers to operate in the U.S.

ATA Chief Economist and Senior Vice President Robert Costello stated in a Sept. 29 letter to United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer that the trucking lobby supports the Mexican truck program because it has helped reduce congestion at U.S.-Mexico ports of entry.

“Congestion increases without NAFTA’s trucking provisions because trailers often return empty after delivering freight across the border,” he wrote. “Sometimes ‘Bobtails’ (tractors without trailers) deliver a trailer only one-way across the border and return solo; and, bobtails and empties are also required to be inspected at the port of entry just like loaded trailers.

“The additional unnecessary equipment increases congestion, delays, ‘overhandling’ of shipments, costs, and the potential for lost and damaged freight,” he added. “As the industry looks well into the future, this provision will be more important as trade increases. It would be shortsighted to end the program now.”

Costello indicated that ATA was stressing its support for the program now because “there are groups fearmongering about Mexican trucks driving beyond the commercial border zone.” He said this is “not an open door policy” as Mexican carriers undergo a case-by-case review before the U.S Department of Transportation grants them authority to operate here.

He also advised out that “the largest Mexican-domiciled carrier in the program, representing over half of all the Mexican drivers permitted to drive beyond the commercial trade zone, is actually owned by an American trucking company.”

Costello added that Mexican carriers operating beyond the commercial border zones have an excellent safety record. “They are operating equipment similar to U.S. motor carriers and must adhere to all U.S. laws and regulations,” he stated. “If North America is going to compete with Asia, South America, and Europe in the world economy, we must have an integrated supply chain and that includes a safe and efficient transportation system to support it.”

Of course, not everyone agrees with that assessment. As pointed out in Politico’s Morning Transportation blog, individual Members of Congress and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters have pushed Ambassador Lighthizer to scrap the Mexican carrier provision during the ongoing renegotiation of the NAFTA treaty.

In an op-ed published in The Detroit News on Oct. 4,  Teamsters President James Hoffa said that at the top of the union's agenda is "fixing the mistake of including long-haul trucking in the original NAFTA. The Teamsters have briefed U.S. and Canadian officials on suggested language that would provide a level playing field, improve truck safety and boost working conditions and wages for Mexican drivers."

Hoffa added that the Teamsters contend that this issue must be addressed. "Not only do truckers stand to benefit, but American lives are at stake. Old and unsafe trucks put our highways at risk and pollute our air, putting the public’s health in jeopardy. That’s not a price people should pay for bad policy."

The Teamsters have long held that “notoriously dangerous” Mexican trucks should be prevented from “driving anywhere on U.S. highways.”

A lawsuit filed by the labor union in 2015 charged that DOT did not produce enough inspection data during its three-year (2011-14) cross-border pilot program to determine if Mexican carriers were safe enough to operate in the U.S. The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association joined the Teamsters in that suit.

In June, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that, regardless of any such data findings, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration holds the law-given discretion to grant operating authority and so the program has continued.

Editor's Note: Updated on Oct. 5 to include comments quoted from a newspaper op-ed written by Teamsters President James Hoffa.

Related: Talks to Revamp NAFTA Slated to Begin This Week

Comments

  1. 1. Marvin [ October 03, 2017 @ 10:41AM ]

    Why of course the ATA supports the Mexican fleets. Why not? They supported ELD'S , they support speed limiters, and damn near everything else to undercut the small carriers and O/O's. But of course it's all in the name of safety or convenience.

 

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

Newsletter

We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.

GotQuestions?
sponsored by
sponsor logo

ELDs and Telematics

Scott Sutarik from Geotab will answer your questions and challenges

View All
GotQuestions?

Sleeper Cab Power

Steve Carlson from Xantrex will answer your questions and challenges

View All