Carriers and Drivers Express Concern with Medical Examiner Registry

April 17, 2017

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe

The American Transportation Research Institute has found that the Medical Examiner Registry is not fixing the problems that fleets and drivers have had with the Department of Transportation medical examination process and may be making them worse.

ATRI released the results of analysis it conducted with the Mayo Clinic looking into the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners.

The NCRME was implemented to improve the DOT physical exam process for drivers and to ensure that medical examiners understand FMCSA regulations and guidance for issuing medical certificates.

However, ATRI said the survey found that drivers and carriers were reporting insignificant improvements in some cases and increasing problems in others.

More than a quarter of drivers surveyed reported that exams were taking 20 minutes or less with 6.5% or respondents saying it took less than 10 minutes to complete. This is less than the amount of time needed to complete all required checks and drivers who had examinations. In addition, exams performed by chiropractors were more likely to have important aspects of the exam skipped.

"The data shows a polarity in the quality of medical examiners," said Clayton T. Cowl, MD, MS, chair of Mayo Clinic's division of preventive, occupational, and aerospace medicine.  "Those examiners who are performing only minimal examinations may have received substandard training or are not taking their role seriously.”

A majority of drivers (63.3%)  reported increased exam costs while not experiencing any improvements to exam quality. Only 6.2% of drivers reported improved exam quality following implementation of the NCRME.

ATRI also said the research identified the following:

  • 26.6% of drivers reported spending 20 minutes or less with their CME, with 6.5% of those drivers spending 10 minutes or less, deemed "an insufficient time to complete all required processes of a DOT physical."  
  • Among the 5.9% of drivers who were not issued a medical certificate on the day of their physical exam, 22.6% cited having a medical condition that required treatment before certificate issuance as the reason.
  • Motor carriers still have “significant concerns” related to the medical certification process, including requests by CMEs for additional medical documentation causing certification delays, driver confusion of how regulatory changes impact the ability to hold a valid medical certificate, and concerns with the competency of CMEs.  Nearly 50% of motor carriers reported that they specify which CME their drivers see to ensure medical exam quality.
  • The ability of drivers to find a CME close to where they live may be more challenging in the future as 15.3% of CMEs reported that they have quit performing DOT physicals or plan to quit performing DOT physicals.

Concerns expressed by motor carriers were across the board given that less than 1% of the carriers reported no major concerns with the medical certification process.

“The key seems to strike a balance between meeting the regulatory intent of the examinations and communicating with drivers ahead of time to minimize confusion regarding the need to document clinical stability,” said Mayo Clinic's Cowl. “This is particularly true for drivers with multiple or complex medical conditions from whom medical examiners do need more documentation in order to make a certification decision."

ATRI and Mayo Clinic jointly surveyed over 900 drivers, 300 carriers, and 1,200 certified medical examiners to better understand the impacts that the NRCME has had on the trucking industry since 2014.

A copy of the report, as well as a white paper detailing the findings of Mayo Clinic's survey of medical examiners, is available on ATRI’s website.


  1. 1. Kenny Scott [ April 18, 2017 @ 05:46AM ]

    My doctor and my wife's 6 doctor 2 pa practice which she is the manger of none of them become Dot certified why because they all said it was stupid. Nothing else to say except ELDs are stupid also in fact maybe the old Fmcsa is it self well educated stupid. Last I heard there are more truck drivers being killed than ever. We need help President Trump

  2. 2. Jeff [ April 18, 2017 @ 06:57AM ]

    As part of my job is to review the medicals of our drivers, I can say honestly that there is inconsistencies between docs and reports. The problem is that the certification for Doctors-and their staff was too easy. I'm sure there was no follow up either to make sure standards were kept.

  3. 3. lee lenard [ April 18, 2017 @ 11:03AM ]

    There is something not right with the ATRI report as detailed in document above. Not quite sure yet, but they are trying demean a system that for the most part has worked very well. I had 4 (four) DOT physicals last year with each by 4 different clinics and doctors and each was very thorough and took better part of a hour. I realize there could be, probably are, a few just for the money but they get exposed very quickly and loose their, read...these cases do show up.

  4. 4. Russ [ April 18, 2017 @ 07:23PM ]

    So what's the problem? Sounds like the CMES are taking it as seriously as the drivers do. I rank having a medical card right up there with ingrown toenails. 10 or 20 minutes with a CME doesn't sound like a problem it sounds like they are as pissed about all of it as the drivers are and are calling bs on it


Comment On This Story

Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.


We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.


ELDs and Telematics

sponsored by
sponsor logo

Scott Sutarik from Geotab will answer your questions and challenges

View All

Sleeper Cab Power

Steve Carlson from Xantrex will answer your questions and challenges

View All