TopNews

Bill Language Could Put 34-Hour Restart at Risk

February 16, 2016

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe
Photo by Jim Park
Photo by Jim Park

Legislation that was intended to strengthen the suspension of some controversial provisions related to the 34-hour restart rules regulating driver hours of service could accidentally kill the 34-hour restart altogether.

In December, President Obama signed into law a fiscal 2016 omnibus funding bill that requires that a study of the restart rule, showing how the rule offers improvements “related to safety, operator fatigue, driver health,” as well as work schedules. But it turns out the law is missing an important sentence.

In late 2014, Congress ordered the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to suspend enforcement of the provisions of the restart that required drivers to take two 1 a.m. to 5 a.m. periods as part of their 34-hour off-duty period and to wait 168 hours from the beginning of one restart period to the beginning of the next.

The suspension was to remain in effect until the Department of Transportation conducted a study of whether or not the more restrictive provisions provided “a greater net benefit for the operational, safety, health and fatigue impacts” and submitted a final report to the House and Senate appropriations committees.

What was previously unclear was what action the DOT was supposed to take on completion of that study.

Apparently, what the omnibus bill did was say that the rule suspension can only be lifted if the Department of Transportation can establish that commercial motor vehicle drivers who operated under the restart provisions in effect between July 1, 2013 (when the new more restrictive restart provisions went into effect), and the day before the restart provisions were suspended "demonstrated statistically significant improvement in all outcomes related to safety, operator fatigue, driver health and longevity, and work schedules, in comparison to commercial motor vehicle drivers who operated under the restart provisions in effect on June 30, 2013.”

However, the American Trucking Associations recently became aware of a problem with the legislative language. Missing is a sentence that should have stated that the current 34-hour restart provision truckers currently use is to remain in place if that DOT study doesn’t prove that the controversial modifications are beneficial.

Without that language, it appears that DOT would have to completely remove the entire 34-hour restart provision when the study is released.

“The impact of the omission is that if the congressionally directed study shows that there were not safety and other benefits to the restart restrictions, then the entire restart — the ability to take a 34-hour rest and reset your weekly clock — goes away. We are working with lawmakers to reach a solution that keeps America’s freight moving safely and efficiently,” an ATA spokesperson was quoted as saying in the association’s Transport Topics newspaper.

Comments

  1. 1. Cliff Downing [ February 17, 2016 @ 04:21AM ]

    And if it went away we would do what? The same thing we did for decades before the 34 restart option came into existence... recap the hours and do what we do. Let's see.. it worked from 1939 to 2003. The 34 reset is an option, not required. I like having it, but the world will not come to an end if it gets removed due to this oversight.

  2. 2. logs [ February 17, 2016 @ 11:41AM ]

    This error (Missing is a sentence) is on them, DOT . and by changing this rule back, the drivers are going to pay for for it and affected by it. Just another STOP to have our truck drivers discourage. If they keep this up with all this rules and making it even more dificult to truck drivers, soon we won't have the goods that we enjoyed buying at the stores.... 34hr re start is not a PROBLEM....

 

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

Newsletter

We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.

GotQuestions?
sponsored by
sponsor logo

ELDs and Telematics

Scott Sutarik from Geotab will answer your questions and challenges

View All
GotQuestions?

Sleeper Cab Power

Steve Carlson from Xantrex will answer your questions and challenges

View All