TopNews

House Ways & Means Gets Earfuls on Fixing Highway Funding Mess

June 17, 2015

By David Cullen

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe
ATA chief Gov. Bill Graves testifying on June 17 before the House Ways & Means Committee Photo: ATA
ATA chief Gov. Bill Graves testifying on June 17 before the House Ways & Means Committee Photo: ATA

Perhaps hoping against hope that this time at bat their arguments would hit home, in testimony Wednesday transportation stakeholders pressed the House Committee on Ways & Means to quickly and finally figure out how to fix the nation’s broken highway-funding system.

But the committee's chairman, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), at the outset of the hearing stated his continued opposition to increasing the per-gallon tax on motor fuels, a solution advocated by many interested parties. 

American Trucking Associations president and CEO, Bill Graves, painted a picture of the impact of the problem, pointing out that Interstate highway congestion alone cost trucking $9.2 billion in 2013 and wasted more than 141 million hours, which he said was the equivalent of 51,000 drivers sitting idle for a full working year.

Graves sought to make Ways & Means members aware that the scope of the infrastructure debate should extend beyond how it affects trucking as an industry.

“Regrettably,” he said, “a staggering lack of investment in our nation’s highway system has produced a $740 billion backlog in funding required to address deteriorating highways and bridges, and the traffic congestion that routinely chokes passenger and freight travel.

“This is not just an esoteric debate about a line item in a budget,” Graves said. “Congress’ actions have real consequences, and the decisions this Committee makes will determine whether a business succeeds or fails and whether a job is created or eliminated.

"And most importantly, these decisions will determine the safety of the motoring public as well as the safety and efficiency of the millions of professional drivers operating daily on our highway system.”

The ATA chief delved into the long-term nature of the problem, as well.

“It is important for all to understand that the decisions made by this Committee over the next few months will have effects beyond the immediate solvency issues,” he said. “The federal commitment to investment in transportation, if not properly addressed this year, could be placed in jeopardy for many years, or even decades, to come.”

Graves worked out the simple math that adds up to the yawning infrastructure gap.

“Current highway capital investment across all government agencies is approximately $88 billion per year,” he explained, but it’s “estimated that $120 billion to $144 billion annually is required to address all needs. Federal funding, which accounted for 52% of state capital outlay in 2013, is an indispensable revenue source and cannot be easily replaced, especially by states with low populations and large highway networks.”

In his testimony, Graves also explained how “multiple short-term extensions of highway policy, coupled with the Highway Trust Fund’s continued funding uncertainty” have stymied efforts by states to carry out many key infrastructure projects.

“Prior to the 2014 extension of MAP-21, transportation officials in 35 states indicated publicly that their programs would be impacted by a shutdown of federal surface transportation funds, and nine states retracted or delayed projects totaling over $366 million due to uncertainty about future federal investment,” he stated.

“This year, 19 states have so far indicated concerns about the feasibility of future transportation projects, and state DOT officials have suggested that over $1.1 billion in projects is at risk if federal funding is disrupted,” Graves continued. “Seven states have already delayed or canceled projects valued at $1.63 billion. This represents more than 45,000 lost jobs.”

Given the magnitude of the highway funding morass and its seeming intractability, Graves said that the trucking industry was “willing to support an even greater commitment” to the Highway Trust Fund.

However, any new revenue sources rolled out to ensure that HTF funding is both stable and long-term should apply uniformly across all types of highway users; be based on verifiable highway and vehicle use; not be easily evaded; and be “inexpensive and efficient to administer and not impede interstate commerce.”

Graves said mechanisms fitting that bill are increasing and indexing the fuel tax, levying a new highway access fee, royalties from oil and gas leases, and a per-barrel tax on imported petroleum and domestic crude oil production.

On the other hand, the ATA chief said that upping such other user fees as the Heavy Vehicle Use Tax and the federal excise tax on trucks or truck tires “would not raise sufficient revenue, and a vehicle miles-traveled tax or tolling are highly inefficient.”

In his testimony, John Cox, president of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials and director of the Wyoming Department of Transportation, pointed out that the HTF “provided stable, reliable and substantial highway and transit funding” for almost 60 years until 2008, when the downward trend began.

That has resulted in almost $62 billion being transferred from the General Fund to the Highway Trust Fund to keep it solvent over the past seven years, he said.

Also looking beyond how highways benefit any one industry, Cox stated that "there is ample documented evidence that shows infrastructure investment is critical for long-term economic growth, increasing productivity, employment, household income, and exports.

"Conversely,” he continued, “without prioritizing our nation's infrastructure needs, deteriorating conditions can produce a severe drag on the overall economy. Whichever revenue tools are utilized, at a minimum, it is crucial to identify solutions that will sustain the MAP-21 level of surface transportation investment in real terms."

In his opening remarks to the hearing, Rep. Ryan, Ways and Means Committee's chairman, conceded there is a highway-funding problem—and it is a big one.

“The roads, bridges, and highways of this country are in a sorry state and the Highway Trust Fund that pays for them is broke,” he said. “But instead of fixing the problem, we’ve dodged it.

"Five times we’ve come up with temporary solutions and transferred money from the general fund into the trust fund— which, in English, means we’ve patched a pothole and not fixed the problem.

"We’re talking over $63 billion in total. And according to the latest projections, we’re looking at a $168 billion shortfall over the next 10 years.”

He also called for finding “a real, long-term solution,” and noted that “there are lots of ideas out there... There's talk of handing more authority over to the states; making greater use of tolls; creating more public-priavte partnerships. There are a lot of ideas worthy of consideraton."

However, Ryan made it plain that in his view, unlike that of ATA among other groups, a funding idea that is not worth considering is raising the motor fuel tax.

Arguing that “we can’t just chase fuel efficiency with higher taxes,” Ryan said he wanted to “make very clear” that he is “against raising the gas tax. There’s not much happening in this economy to help it grow, but lower gas prices is one of them.”

Comments

  1. 1. Mike [ June 18, 2015 @ 03:20AM ]

    How many TRILLIONS of Obama bucks have been spent on infrastructure and shovel ready jobs? Where the hell did that money go? Oh, some solar farm in the desert or windmill farm in a field, or bike paths, or bullet trains to no where... So, where did all of this tax payer funny money REALLY go? Who's pocket did it land in? And where is Biden? He was put in charge of all of this funding. Is that crickets I hear?

  2. 2. smalltown [ June 19, 2015 @ 03:36AM ]

    It paid for fancy cross walks in my small town !
    Maybe next we can get some sidewalks....

  3. 3. Cary [ June 19, 2015 @ 06:45AM ]

    How about the billions and billions of dollars being siphoned from the taxpayers and sent to all the mid-eastern countries that hate us? We make enough money and are actually paying enough money to fix all the problems we have. The elected officials are wasting it all. THAT'S THE PROBLEM!

  4. 4. arcane [ June 21, 2015 @ 04:11AM ]

    how about getting all of that money that those IRS ripoff,scamming crooks stole from peoples inheritances and use that to pay for highway funding.
    the IRS has to and should be destroyed. and all employees brutally beaten and set on fire

  5. 5. Justin [ June 21, 2015 @ 06:11AM ]

    I say let the country's infrastructure crumble.Especially the highway system.Goods transportation would grind to a halt.People ,including elected officials, would run out of toilet paper and feminine products and not be able to get any more.Then we can all sit back and say'we told you so!'
    Obama's Congress has made a legacy that will hurt for generations to come.

  6. 6. Chuck [ June 21, 2015 @ 06:30AM ]

    Wow this is such a simple fix.
    USE THE MOUNTAINS OF TAX MONEY WE ARE FORCED TO PAY TO FIX THE HIGHWAYS INSTEAD OF BEING STOLEN FOR "OTHER" PROJECTS !!

 

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

Newsletter

We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.

GotQuestions?
sponsored by
sponsor logo

ELDs and Telematics

Scott Sutarik from Geotab will answer your questions and challenges

View All
GotQuestions?

Sleeper Cab Power

Steve Carlson from Xantrex will answer your questions and challenges

View All