Congress can't do its job on the highway bill, so the public is going to have to take the lead, says a group of infrastructure experts including five former secretaries of transportation.
The federal highway program is now running on its ninth temporary extension because Congress will not compromise on how to pay for it, said the 60 experts brought together by the University Virginia's Miller Center.
"Absent a greater sense of urgency about the need to act, Congress is likely to continue defaulting to repeated extensions, and comprehensive reauthorizing legislation will remain caught in larger disputes about the federal debt and spending," they say in their analysis
The solution, they say, is to ratchet up public pressure.
"The right message carried with the right mix of compelling voices on the local and national stage could spur political leaders to set aside their differences, rise above the current quagmire of inaction, and take steps to adopt and pursue a vision of transportation policy for the 21st century that will drive economic growth, enhance U.S. competitiveness and create jobs."
Their prescription calls for a message with a positive tone that stresses economic growth, jobs and competitiveness. It must take the timing of the presidential election into account. It must use traditional and social media, and it must link local transportation investment opportunities to national policy decisions.
That's a tall order in the short time left before Congress has to either agree on a bill or pass yet another extension.
The current extension expires June 30. The Senate has a bill, a two-year, $109 billion measure. The House has not been able to pass its five-year, $260 billion proposal, so it recently passed another extension in order to set up a conference with the Senate.
There are important similarities between the Senate and House approaches, notably in the reforms they make in transportation governance. Both streamline the program structure at the Department of Transportation, eliminate earmarks and take steps to speed up project completion.
But the differences will be difficult to overcome. The House extension, for instance, would force completion of the Keystone XL pipeline, which if it survives conference could lead to a veto by President Obama.
Yesterday the Senate named eight Democrats and six Republicans to the conference committee charged with negotiating the final highway bill.
The Democrats are: Max Baucus, Mont., Barbara Boxer, Calif., Jay Rockefeller, W.Va., Dick Durbin, Ill., Tim Johnson, S.D., Bill Nelson, Fla., Charles Schumer, N.Y., Bob Menendez, N.J.
The Republicans are: James Inhofe, Okla., David Vitter, La., Orin Hatch, Utah, Richard Shelby, Ala., Kay Bailey Hutchison, Texas, and John Hoeven, N.D.
The House is scheduled to name its negotiators today.
Down the Road
The University of Virginia group, which includes former Transportation Secretaries Norman Mineta, Sam Skinner, Mary Peters, Rodney Slater and James Burnley, is looking further down the road than the conference committee is likely to see.
Their vision includes a campaign that will commence this year and run through all of next year, targeting the next highway legislation.
They listed five communication "hooks" to gather public support, starting with the expiration of the current extension June 30. This could be the occasion to highlight local projects that deserve federal support.
The next event would be the July 4 weekend, when editors like to run feature stories about driving, fuel prices and traffic congestion. After that come the Democratic and Republican conventions, where infrastructure needs to be a leading issue.
The next priority is to ensure that the candidates lay out their policies and plans as the election nears. And after the election, the infrastructure campaign must send a message that the public is demanding action from the next Congress and administration.
"Through a smart, aggressive, and coordinated new communications effort, transportation advocates and stakeholders can elevate their issue to a level not experienced since President Eisenhower's era," the group said.
"It is our belief that once citizens become aware of the significant costs and risks associated with a compromised transportation system operating at less than optimal capacity, they will feel more compelled to demand calls for action that will, in turn, prompt policy makers to act."