(Photo courtesy of CVSA)

By Oliver B. Patton, Washington Editor

It is not a simple thing for police to enforce the new federal ban on texting. The fact is, a patrolman at automobile level cannot see for sure what a driver is doing in a truck cab above him. That's only one of several concerns the enforcement community has about the guidance issued last month by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.

But drivers and carriers should be aware that the policy does have teeth.

"I feel confident that should a driver have a collision involving texting, that they can expect the maximum fine the first time from FMCSA," said Capt. Dan Meyer of the Kansas Highway Patrol. "I feel 100 percent confident in that statement."

The fine can go up to $2,750, and criminal penalties can apply as well. "Texting can be a criminal violation if it precipitates a fatal or injury crash," FMCSA Administrator Anne Ferro said when the ban was announced.

Carriers can expect police to subpoena a driver's cell phone to see if he was texting at the time of the crash, said Steve Keppler, interim executive director of the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance, which represents the enforcement community.

Buzzy France, administrative officer with the Maryland State Police and president of CVSA, put it this way: "If there's an accident (police) can apply for a search warrant and check that cell phone and determine if you were texting. If you were in violation, you know what's going to happen."

Non-Accident Enforcement

While the post-accident aspect of enforcement is straightforward, everyone from Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood down to the patrolman on the highway understands that it will be difficult to catch a driver in the act of texting.

"Enforcement of cell phone misuse while driving is difficult and we need to figure it out," LaHood said when he announced the FMCSA ban. He acknowledged that to a certain extent the ban is a symbolic act, intended to send a message.

France said that if a patrolman sees a truck driver texting, he'll definitely enforce the ban. "But how does a patrolman see it? I don't see a lot of enforcement going on with that violation at the moment. Everyone understands that it is a tough violation to enforce."

In Maryland, the situation is complicated by a state law that bans texting but does not ban receiving texts. "You can get a text and look at it, but you can't text back while you're driving," France said.

Police in Kansas will have no hesitation at all in using the FMCSA guidance as a tool in enforcement, Meyer said. "We fully support the ban and we will do whatever we have to, to ensure the safety of the public."

"(But) from the roadside perspective it is going to be somewhat difficult to distinguish between somebody looking down and dialing a phone, versus texting," he said.

Administrative Issues

Apart from this physical limitation, there are administrative complexities that are causing the enforcement community to approach the issue cautiously, according to Keppler of CVSA.

FMCSA posted its ban on texting as a "guidance" - essentially, an interpretation of a more generic safety rule - while it works on a proposed rule targeting not just texting but overall cell phone use by truck drivers. This approach gave the agency a quick way of getting a simple texting ban in place while it figures out the much more complicated question of cell phone usage. That proposal was supposed to be opened for public comment in February, but it is not on schedule.

Keppler said that states will do their best to enforce the ban but many will wait to see what's in the rule before they make major changes in their systems.

One issue is that the states must adopt FMCSA regulations before they can start enforcing them. About half of the states do that automatically, but the other half must go through a legislative process that can take months, Keppler said.

Another issue is that by putting the texting ban on a fast track, the agency left unanswered some questions that the enforcement community must still address.

One issue, for example, is how enforcement officials should handle compliance with the texting ban when they do on-site Compliance Reviews at carrier facilities. Inspectors can compare driver logs with cell phone records to see if the driver was texting illegally, but the procedures for doing such sampling are not clear, Keppler said.

"There are a lot of things that go into enforceability of rules, and the clarity of the rule can be changed by the notice and comment process (that will accompany the proposed rule,)" he said. "I think many of the states will wait and see what (the rule) looks like before going gangbusters."

Keppler also said there are many competing enforcement issues at the state level, including, notably, resources. "(The texting ban) is Mom and Apple Pie but there are lots of other competing interests. This is an unfunded mandate," he said.

CVSA is working on policy principles that should be available soon, he said.

Looking Ahead

In the longer term, LaHood and the enforcement community want to see action by the wireless industry to figure out how to prevent use of cell phones while driving. Meyer of the Kansas State Patrol suggested that one alternative might be to make texting inoperable while a vehicle is in motion. "That would be the simplest thing, to be proactive in that manner than reactive and punitive."

Meanwhile, though, as LaHood said, a large part of reducing the peril of driving while distracted comes down to individuals taking responsibility for their own actions.

France put it this way: "The fact of the matter is, in most instances the police will not be able to enforce the rule. So it is up to each of us as individuals to do the safe thing."





Government/Regulations: Related News

9/2/2010 - Pennsylvania to Step Up Roadside Inspections of Waste Haulers
Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection and State Police have plans to step up inspections of waste haulers, with increased funding in the year ahead.... More >

9/1/2010 - California Approves Amended Copper Bill
The California Assembly has passed SB 346 this week, which restricts the amount of copper in brake friction material sold in the state.... More >

9/1/2010 - Safety Advisors Suggest Reducing In-Cab Distractions
Distracted driving is best countered by a wide-ranging effort to instill a culture of safety among all drivers, but in trucking specifically it would be helpful to reduce in-cab distractions, says a committee of safety experts.... More >

8/31/2010 - FMCSA Seeks Industry Feedback
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration said it will hold a public listening session to get feedback on key challenges facing the motor carrier industry, issues facing stakeholders and concerns that should be considered by the agency in developing its next five-year strategic plan.... More >

8/30/2010 - White House to Meet with Groups About Truck Buying Incentive
A coalition of trucking groups pushing for a tax break for truckers to buy new trucks are tentatively scheduled to meet with staff members at the White House this week.... More >

8/26/2010 - International Enforcement Effort Cracks Down on Illegal Hazmat Transport
Enforcement agencies across the U.S. and Canada participated in a two-day operation on Aug. 17-18 aimed at cracking down on the illegal transportation of hazardous materials.... More >

8/25/2010 - California Amends Copper Bill Following Negotiations
California has amended a bill that restricts the amount of copper in brake friction material sold in the state, following negotiations between the Motor Equipment Manufacturers Association, environmentalists and automakers.... More >

8/23/2010 - Ohio Governor Proposes Higher Truck Weight Limit
Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland has proposed to increase truck weights on the state's highways to increase exports... More >

8/23/2010 - Nine Charged in CDL Scam in Pennsylvania
A U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania charged nine defendants with knowingly producing, attempting to produce, conspiring to produce and aiding and abetting the production of false Pennsylvania commercial driver's licenses.... More >

8/20/2010 - CARB Pushes Back Hearing on Proposed Amendments; Workshops Added
The California Air Resources Board has postponed the hearing to consider the proposed amendments to the Tractor-Trailer (aerodynamics) Greenhouse Gas Regulation, Truck and Bus (engine) Regulation, and Drayage Truck (engine) Regulation until November 2010.... More >

8/20/2010 - ATA Urges PHMSA to Reconsider Proposed Hazmat Carrier Fitness Rules
In a testimony before the Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, American Trucking Associations Vice President Rich Moskowitz told the agency that proposed standards for hazardous material carrier fitness were unacceptable... More >

8/18/2010 - ATA Pushes FMCSA on CSA 2010 Crash Accountability
While the American Trucking Associations has had a positive reaction to the changes the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration made to its CSA 2010 methodology, the group is still pushing the FMCSA to address the issue of crash accountability.... More >

8/17/2010 - A Fifth of Carriers at Risk of Intervention Under CSA 2010
One in five carriers are at risk of an intervention under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's new methodology for calculating safety measures under CSA 2010, according to an analysis of safety performance by Rair Technologies.... More >

8/16/2010 - Non-Idaho Carriers See the Benefits of Idaho's Special Trailer Plate
The Idaho Transportation Department says one year after its launch, the North America Permanent Trailer Plate is being well received among non-Idaho customers.... More >

8/16/2010 - Now's the Time to Be Proactive, Not Reactive on CSA 2010
With about four months left until the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010 is set to take effect, carriers should take the opportunity to be proactive, not reactive to the new safety plan, said Jim Angel, PeopleNet's safety and compliance product manager. Angel gave fleets tips on how to be more proactive on CSA 2010 during two presentations at PeopleNet's User Conference 2010, held last week in Boca Raton, Fla.... More >

8/16/2010 - DOT to Post Changes in Drug Testing
The Department of Transportation plans to amend some of its rules covering drug and alcohol testing, and training requirements for Medical Review Officers.... More >

8/12/2010 - CSA 2010 Changes Look Promising, Carriers Say
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration appears to have made a good start at correcting shortcomings in its CSA 2010 Safety Measurement System, according to trucking companies that are testing the program.

Preliminary reports from carriers in the states where CSA 2010 is being pilot-tested indicate that safety scores are changing "somewhat dramatically" under revised system, said David Osiecki, senior vice president of Policy and Regulatory Affairs at American Trucking Associations.... More >

8/6/2010 - Congress Joins Fight Over Control of Port Truck Drivers
The fight over control of port truck drivers spilled out of the courtroom into Congress last week when Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., offered a bill that would give ports more authority over drayage operations.

Under current law, states and local authorities such as ports are barred from regulating truck prices, routes or service. Nadler's Clean Ports Act would create an exemption to let these entities set requirements... More >

8/6/2010 - New Legislation Would Allow States to Raise Truck Weight Limits
New legislation introduced in the Senate would allow state Departments of Transportation to raise interstate weight limits to 97,000 pounds for trucks with six axles instead of five.... More >