The Ports of Los Angeles, Oakland and New York and New Jersey have been trying to get more control over trucking operations at their harbors, but the AAPA wants no part of it. (Photo courtesy of the Port of Long Beach)

During a meeting of its Legislative Policy Council this week, the American Association of Port Authorities said that it would not be a part of the efforts by the ports of Los Angeles, Oakland and New York-New Jersey to regulate truck drayage operations, according to reports by the Journal of Commerce.

The Ports of Los Angeles, Oakland and New York and New Jersey have taken action to urge Congress to intercede and change the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act, which prohibits states from enacting and enforcing laws that are "related to" motor carrier prices, routes, or services in order to maximize competitive forces in the trucking industry. These ports wish to have the authority to regulate trucking operations at the ports, such as security, congestion and the environment, the JOC reports.

However, the AAPA has voted to opt out of the movement, saying that the ports already have enough authority to ban older trucks, the JOC says.

The JOC reports that there are outside interests at play in the ports efforts, such as labor, environmental and community groups, looking to gain more control over trucking operations at the ports.

Susan Monteverde, vice president of government relations at AAPA, told the JOC that the ports currently can regulate the vehicle, not the carrier, and if these ports want to be have control over the way carriers do business at their harbors, the law must be altered.

In October, the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles celebrated the one-year anniversary of their Clean Truck programs, announcing they are on track to reduce truck-related emissions by 80 percent, two years ahead of schedule. Since inception, the programs have purged the roads of more than 2,000 polluting trucks, with more than 5,500 clean trucks in operation today.

This improvement in emissions at the ports was one of the main reasons the AAPA opted out of the efforts, Monteverde told the JOC. She said that with the emissions reductions, there was not enough reason to pursue a change in the law.





Intermodal: Related News

9/8/2010 - New Norfolk Southern Corridor to Increase Double-Stack Capacity
Norfolk Southern Railway will open its Heartland Corridor intermodal corridor this week, which will increase intermodal freight capacity by raising vertical clearances in 28 tunnels on a Norfolk Southern rail line between the port of Hampton Roads, Va., and Chicago known as the Heartland Corridor.... More >

9/3/2010 - Rail, Intermodal Volume Reach Highest Level This Year
Last week, the U.S. railroads set new record highs for 2010 in both rail carloads and intermodal volume, according to the Association of American Railroads.... More >

8/20/2010 - Railroads Post Record High Volumes For 2010
Rail intermodal traffic on U.S. railroads set another record high for the year, with 233,767 total trailers and containers for the week ending Aug. 14... More >

8/20/2010 - Virginia Completes I-81 Corridor Improvements
The final phase of improvement projects in Northern Virginia aimed at handling more trains at higher speeds has been completed, eliminating a choke point on Norfolk Southern's Crescent Corridor.... More >

8/19/2010 - Direct ChassisLink to Expand Into Southeast, Gulf
Direct ChassisLink said it will expand its chassis program to the Southeast and Gulf inland regions starting Sept. 7.... More >

8/16/2010 - Analysis Finds LA Ports Underutilized Despite Increased Truck Traffic
A recent analysis by the marine terminal operators at the Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach shows that nearly half of trucks conducted at least four transactions per day in late July, while almost two-thirds of trucks made three or more transactions per day.... More >

8/16/2010 - Intermodal Volumes Show Strong Second Quarter
Intermodal volumes closed out the second quarter with a 17.2 percent year-over-year boost... More >