Safety & Compliance

ATA on CSA Proposal: Move to 'Risk-Based' Enforcement

June 30, 2015

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's proposed changes to its Compliance, Safety, Accountability system, announced this week, were largely the result of a new report made public by the Department of Transportation. The American Trucking Associations applauds the proposals but says there's much more than needs to be done.

ATA Monday issued a statement calling on the FMCSA to accelerate the agency’s efforts to integrate more risk-based assessments into its enforcement programs in light of the new report.

“We appreciate the department and FMCSA finally making public the report and recommendations the independent review team submitted to the Secretary of Transportation last July,” said ATA President and CEO Bill Graves. “It is clear that, since receiving it last summer, FMCSA has been taking some positive steps to respond accordingly.  It’s also clear that much more remains to be done.”

The report was issued by an independent review team appointed by the Secretary of Transportation in response to two specific National Transportation Safety Board recommendations. During investigations of four serious commercial motor vehicle crashes, NTSB found that FMCSA had failed to identify significant safety issues during prior audits of the motor carriers involved in the crashes.

“ATA is particularly pleased that the Independent Review Team highlighted the critical need for FMCSA to better align compliance and enforcement programs with the risks that actually cause crashes,” said ATA Executive Vice President and Chief of Advocacy Dave Osiecki. “A number of stakeholders, including the Government Accountability Office, have observed the agency is often focused on compliance issues that do not bear a relationship to crash risk.”

The report presents a range of recommendations relating to FMCSA’s Compliance, Safety, Accountability program, more efficient use of field enforcement resources, ways to make on-site compliance reviews more effective and measures to incent carrier-based, non-regulatory safety initiatives. For instance, the report points out CSA could be more effective if behaviors directly and immediately connected to crash risk were separated from “form and manner” compliance issues, notes ATA.

In particular, the association says, the report discussed how, during on-site audits, investigators sometimes ignore violations that may relate to crash risk in favor of paperwork issues that are easier to document and more readily available.

“In the interest of preventing CMV crashes, FMCSA should make a greater commitment to be “risk-based” and reform its compliance and enforcement programs accordingly,” Osiecki said. “And, we’re pleased that FMCSA is moving forward with a new partnership program aimed at recognizing trucking fleets whose safety policies and programs go beyond regulatory compliance. Both of these efforts ensure the most efficient use of resources and are in the shared interests of government, the industry and other highway users.” 

Comments

  1. 1. Mike [ July 01, 2015 @ 03:27AM ]

    Non safety issue, like signing the log at the beginning of the day.
    First off do you go before a judge and swear to tell the truth After you testify ?

  2. 2. Mark Darling [ July 01, 2015 @ 05:31AM ]

    when are the regulatory powers to be going to startb demanding that automobile drivers become better trained before they et a license. Report after report indicates that 75% of truck collisions are the direct result of the automiobile driver. Faster cars, more untrained non english speaking and english speaking individuals on the highway leads to crashes.

  3. 3. Mad Trucker [ July 17, 2015 @ 06:31AM ]

    Who ever put the CSA severity weighting system together must a kindergarden child. The industry should have demanded to sit in on the concept at inception. It is a one sided equasion. Get good inspections or else. Many states throughout the US are going bankrupt and the theory is that they are looking at all 18 wheelers as cash cows, ATM machines on wheels if you would. The industry needs to step up and put an end to this malarchy! CSA needs a complete overhaul.

 

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

Newsletter

We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.

GotQuestions?
sponsored by
sponsor logo

ELDs and Telematics

Scott Sutarik from Geotab will answer your questions and challenges

View All
GotQuestions?

Sleeper Cab Power

Steve Carlson from Xantrex will answer your questions and challenges

View All