The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has settled a suit by three trucking associations over information published in the CSA program.
The agency said in the Wednesday announcement that it will change the way it displays CSA safety scores, in response to the carrier groups' contention that the original plan was flawed and should have gone through a public-comment procedure.
"CSA is a safety-critical program that helps to reduce commercial motor vehicle-related crashes and save lives," said FMCSA Administrator Anne Ferro in a statement. "Through this settlement agreement, we addressed the concerns raised by petitioners without compromising the CSA program and its safety benefits."
The key change, which will be in place by March 25, replaces the "ALERT" symbol now displayed in orange on the website with a symbol that shows an exclamation mark inside a yellow triangle. Also, the disclaimer language will be revised to explain that the exclamation-mark symbol indicates that while the agency may consider further monitoring of the carrier, it does not imply a safety rating.
"Readers should not draw conclusions about a carrier's overall safety condition simply based on the data displayed in this system," the new language will say. "Unless a motor carrier … has received an UNSATISFACTORY safety rating … or has otherwise been ordered to discontinue operations by the FMCSA, it is authorized to operate on the nation's roadways."
The agency then refers readers to where they can get a carrier's safety rating (http://safer.fmcsa.dot.gov), and its license and insurance status (http://li-public.fmcsa.dot.gov).
The suit was brought by the National Association of Small Trucking Companies, the Expedite Alliance of North America and the Air & Expedited Motor Carriers Association, which say they represent about 2,750 small carriers.
The groups had asked for a stay to block the release of the information last December, but that tactic failed when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said they did not meet the standards for a stay pending court review. They continued with their suit, however, and came away with this result.
The carrier groups are pleased with the settlement.
"We applaud the agency for affirmatively restating its sole duty to credential carriers as safe for operation over the nation's roadways," they said in a joint statement. "We believe these changes will disabuse shippers and brokers of the misconception that SMS methodology, percentile rankings of carriers, and monitoring thresholds are intended for their use in determining carrier fitness. This important settlement confirms for a confused industry that it is still the job of the FMCSA to certify carriers."
It also is important that the agency is directing readers to the licensing and insurance data bases, the groups said. This will reaffirm that unless a carrier is rated as unsatisfactory or out of service, the safety agency has determined it is fit to do business.
Henry Seaton, an attorney for the groups, said that with this settlement the agency "has affirmed its statutory duty to credential carriers as safe to operate."
The agency said in the Wednesday announcement that it will change the way it displays CSA safety scores, in response to the carrier groups' contention that the original plan was flawed and should have gone through a public-comment procedure.
"CSA is a safety-critical program that helps to reduce commercial motor vehicle-related crashes and save lives," said FMCSA Administrator Anne Ferro in a statement. "Through this settlement agreement, we addressed the concerns raised by petitioners without compromising the CSA program and its safety benefits."
The key change, which will be in place by March 25, replaces the "ALERT" symbol now displayed in orange on the website with a symbol that shows an exclamation mark inside a yellow triangle. Also, the disclaimer language will be revised to explain that the exclamation-mark symbol indicates that while the agency may consider further monitoring of the carrier, it does not imply a safety rating.
"Readers should not draw conclusions about a carrier's overall safety condition simply based on the data displayed in this system," the new language will say. "Unless a motor carrier … has received an UNSATISFACTORY safety rating … or has otherwise been ordered to discontinue operations by the FMCSA, it is authorized to operate on the nation's roadways."
The agency then refers readers to where they can get a carrier's safety rating (http://safer.fmcsa.dot.gov), and its license and insurance status (http://li-public.fmcsa.dot.gov).
The suit was brought by the National Association of Small Trucking Companies, the Expedite Alliance of North America and the Air & Expedited Motor Carriers Association, which say they represent about 2,750 small carriers.
The groups had asked for a stay to block the release of the information last December, but that tactic failed when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said they did not meet the standards for a stay pending court review. They continued with their suit, however, and came away with this result.
The carrier groups are pleased with the settlement.
"We applaud the agency for affirmatively restating its sole duty to credential carriers as safe for operation over the nation's roadways," they said in a joint statement. "We believe these changes will disabuse shippers and brokers of the misconception that SMS methodology, percentile rankings of carriers, and monitoring thresholds are intended for their use in determining carrier fitness. This important settlement confirms for a confused industry that it is still the job of the FMCSA to certify carriers."
It also is important that the agency is directing readers to the licensing and insurance data bases, the groups said. This will reaffirm that unless a carrier is rated as unsatisfactory or out of service, the safety agency has determined it is fit to do business.
Henry Seaton, an attorney for the groups, said that with this settlement the agency "has affirmed its statutory duty to credential carriers as safe to operate."
media brand
0 Comments
See all comments