Fleet Management

Detroit Diesel to Pay $28.5 Million in Clean Air Act Settlement

October 13, 2016

By David Cullen

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe
Image: U.S. Department of Justice
Image: U.S. Department of Justice

Detroit Diesel Corp. will pay $28.5 million, in a combination of fines and funding for pollution-reduction projects, to settle alleged violations of the Clean Air Act that the Department of Justice said entailed selling heavy-duty diesel engines that were not certified by the Environmental Protection Agency and did not meet applicable emission standards.

Per the settlement agreement announced by DOJ, Detroit Diesel will pay a $14 million civil penalty and spend $14.5 million on projects to reduce nitrogen oxide and other pollutants, including replacing “high-polluting” diesel school buses and locomotive engines with models that meet current emissions standards.  

The government’s complaint, filed on Oct. 7 in tandem with the settlement, alleges that Detroit Diesel violated the Clean Air Act by “introducing into commerce 7,786 heavy-duty diesel engines for use in trucks and buses in model year 2010 without a valid EPA-issued certificate of conformity demonstrating conformance with Clean Air Act standards to control nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions,” said DOJ. The complaint also alleges that the engines did not conform to emission standards applicable to model year 2010 engines.

“This case demonstrates the critical importance of EPA’s vehicle and engine certification program to achieving the goals of the Clean Air Act,” said Assistant Attorney General John C. Cruden for the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division.  “By not certifying the engines in accordance with the rules, Detroit Diesel Corp. increased pollution and undercut competitors. We will uphold the integrity of that program by holding accountable those that skirt the rules.”

Per a statement received from David Giroux, director of corporate communications for Daimler Trucks North America, Detroit Diesel’s parent firm, in the second half of 2009 the engine maker received “an unexpected increase” in orders for MY2009 engines. 

“To complete production of those engines in 2009, Detroit would have had to ramp up production by adding shifts,” the statement reads. “Because of the low number of orders for MY2010 engines, Detroit would have then had to lay off workers at the end of the year and run a skeleton shift for the first half of 2010.  Instead of interrupting the labor force in that way, Detroit chose to take advantage of a provision in the Clean Air Act regulations that it believed allowed it to begin assembly of the MY2009 engines in 2009 and complete the engines in 2010.” 

The statement explains that by using this “short block” assembly method, Detroit Diesel assembled approximately 80% of each engine in 2009, including the crankshaft, block, pistons, and connecting rods. The engine maker then stored the short block engines temporarily and completed the remaining assembly in early 2010. 

DTNA also stated that before beginning short block assembly, Detroit Diesel informed EPA of its intent but “ultimately, the EPA disagreed with Detroit’s interpretation of the regulations, but not until it was too late for Detroit to reverse course. The EPA now asserts that because they were completed in 2010, the short block engines should have met the 2010 emission standards.” 

Detroit Diesel General Counsel Brian Burton added that while the company disagrees with EPA’s position and was “surprised to receive the EPA’s conclusion that its definition of ‘produced’ didn’t apply to our engines, to avoid litigation and stay focused on producing the most efficient engines in the market, Detroit has decided to settle with the EPA.

Comments

  1. 1. Bob R [ October 14, 2016 @ 04:47AM ]

    No, I didnt read the whole article. This is simple, IF you are a Climate warming ,Changing, whatever, then you are thrilled that yet another "nasty big" corporation has been brought to heel by yet another regulatory Govt. agency.
    To me, ......Just another "tax" to fund a fund this agency, which we will ALL pay for.

  2. 2. Walter Zoomie [ October 14, 2016 @ 07:05AM ]

    "Detroit Diesel will pay a $14 million civil penalty and spend $14.5 million on projects to reduce nitrogen oxide and other pollutants..."

    $14 mil civil penalty? Who gets THAT cash? Govt lawyers and thugs, that's who. Some rob you with a six gun, some rob you with a fountain pen.

    A modern, properly tuned diesel engine runs very clean. What do they expect to come out of the exhaust? Skittles and unicorn farts?
    No...what they expect is to shut down the industry and make the US and its dirt-people citizens third world slaves.

    A complete scam and shakedown. Our government is corrupt beyond belief.

  3. 3. Michael Benedetti [ October 14, 2016 @ 09:08AM ]

    That's nothing. Wait till Hillary gets in.

  4. 4. ChromeGetsUHome [ October 14, 2016 @ 03:51PM ]

    The EPA should be the one paying out large penalties. Through mandates on emissions, they have led to the loss of untold millions by contractors, company drivers (opportunity cost), carriers and dealers/finance companies. If Obama had a beer summit with me and 4 friends, I bet we could craft a plan to reduce emissions without taking so much away from those in the trucking industry. As is, I bet emissions equipment adds $3,000 to $11,000 in maintenance costs per year per OTR truck, not to mention the HUGE increase emissions changes have led to in truck purchase prices.

  5. 5. les [ October 16, 2016 @ 08:31AM ]

    When those union workers at Detroit want to know where their raise is- make sure and let them know the Democrats in government beat them to it

  6. 6. Fred [ January 14, 2017 @ 10:45AM ]

    It just amazes me the far right wing attitudes here. This "government, liberals are responsible for all our troubles, blah, blah, blah" is just stupid. Sorry but diesel soot does cause major health problems but I guess you don't care about that if it inconveniences you, must be GOP climate change deniers being right over 99% of the world's scientists even though you are not in any way trained to make a fact based opinion.
    I do feel bad about the reliability problems caused by emission controls, it is very similar to the lousy gas engines when they started really clamping down on pollution but now gas engines are powerful and cleaner running. The manufacturers seem to just slap on anything to get the engines to pass without really testing them and they bring out the existing poor design issues in them. It's the same dollars over quality thinking that plague so many manufacturers like Caterpillar. Maybe you should be bitching about and to the manufacturers and stop blaming everything on the government.

 

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

Newsletter

We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.

GotQuestions?
sponsored by
sponsor logo

ELDs and Telematics

Scott Sutarik from Geotab will answer your questions and challenges

View All
GotQuestions?

Sleeper Cab Power

Steve Carlson from Xantrex will answer your questions and challenges

View All