Fleet Management

Court Rules NLRB Went Too Far with Poster Rule

June 19, 2013

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has affirmed a lower court decision that the National Labor Relations Board went too far when it required employers to post a notice of employee rights.

According to an arcile from J.J. Keller, the decision, issued on June 14, affirms a ruling from the District Court of South Carolina. In addition, it agrees with a ruling issued on May 7 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which also struck down the posting requirement.

"Because the Board is nowhere charged with informing employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act, we find no indication in the plain language of the Act that Congress intended to grant the Board the authority to promulgate such a requirement," the Appeals Court stated in the decision for the case, Chamber of Commerce v. NLRB.

The NLRB had issued a rule in August 2011 requiring employers to post a notice telling employees of their rights under the NLRA. The requirement was scheduled to go into effect in April 2012, but has been on hold because of legal challenges, including opposition from the American Trucking Associations.

At the time, ATA submitted comments opposing the NLRB proposal as being beyond the NLRB’s statutory authority. The NLRB said it introduced the rule to fill a knowledge gap and make employees aware of their NLRA rights.

Click here to read the full story from J.J. Keller.

Comments

  1. 1. George Stokes [ June 20, 2013 @ 07:38AM ]

    Do you wonder why the different interests party to this lawsuit felt so strongly about this matter they had to sue the NLRB? Like the ATA and such? Here's a clue: they don't want their employees knowing what their rights are under federal labor law. Whether the NLRB exceeded it's authority is a technicality... this was all about keeping workers in the dark, plain and simple...

  2. 2. Dick Gaib [ June 24, 2013 @ 04:20AM ]

    GEORGE STOKES, HAS SAID IT ALL. WHY SHOULD THIS NOT BE DONE? MORE BIG MONEY, AND POWER. AND THEN A LOT OF CARRIERS, SAY WE HAVE TROUBLE KEEPING DRIVERS, DA, WHY IS THIS??

 

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

Newsletter

We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.



GotQuestions?

LUBRICANTS

The expert, Mark Betner from Citgo will answer your questions
Ask a question

Sponsored by


WHEEL ENDS SOLUTIONS

Wheel end expert Jeff Geist from STEMCO will answer your questions
Ask a question

Sponsored by

Magazine