Equipment

Fourth Lawsuit Filed In Past Week Against Navistar Over International Engines

July 11, 2014

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe

UPDATED -- The numbers of lawsuits filed against Navistar over its International engines are piling, as lawyers for three more trucking companies have filed a federal class action in federal court in Illinois.

The complaint alleges that Navistar actively concealed that its 2008-2013 model trucks, equipped with the MaxxForce Advanced exhaust gas recirculation diesel engines, contained a defective emission system that caused the trucks to suddenly break down.

"The problems with these engines have cost buyers and lessees, including many small, family-owned businesses, thousands of dollars," said Jonathan D. Selbin of the law firm Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein. "In some cases, the unexpected mechanical problems endangered owners' ability to earn a living. The lawsuit seeks to hold Navistar responsible for the quality of its engines and ensure that buyers and lessees of Navistar trucks get what they paid for."

The law firm is representing Denis Gray Trucking, Washington; Carmichael Leasing d.b.a. Carmichael NationaLease, Illinois, and GTL Enterprises, Washington. The International trucks in question were purchased in California, Illinois, and Washington.

The complaint alleges that the MaxxForce engine is defective and the alleged defects lead to repeated failures, well before completion of its intended and expected useful life, requiring costly repairs often at the expense of owners and lessees. It also claims when the trucks were brought in for repairs during the warranty period, Navistar didn't properly repair the emission system and instead replaced them with another equally defective failure-prone system.

It is also alleged that the defect rendered the MaxxForce engines unreasonably dangerous at the time the Navistar trucks were purchased. “The defect can and has led to sudden breakdowns, forcing trucks, often heavily loaded with cargo, to attempt emergency maneuvers, such as pulling to the side of the road. The defect also causes coolant and exhaust fumes to enter the passenger compartment of the Navistar trucks, causing risks of driver poisoning from the fumes,” according to a statement from the law firm.

The proposed class consists of all current and former purchasers and lessees of 2008-2013 model year Navistar vehicles nationwide equipped with MaxxForce Advanced EGR diesel Engines.

The case follow three separate yet similar lawsuits that were filed days ago by lawyers representing three fleets in their home states of Tennessee, Texas and Washington.

All claim Navistar failed to disclose known defects and problems with its EPA 2010 MaxxForce engines and the company misled its clients regarding Navistar’s exhaust gas recirculation technology on the engines, including them being certified to meet the Environmental Protection Agency’s 2010 emissions standards. 

When contacted about these three lawsuits, Navistar spokesperson Elissa Maurer said, “As a matter of a company policy, we don’t comment on pending litigation.”

Update adds the names of the plaintiff trucking companies.

Comments

  1. 1. ron gregory [ October 16, 2014 @ 09:29PM ]

    purchased 2012 prostar with 302000 miles on Oct 3rd . first 2000 miles no problems then engine check light came on. I s topped at dealer in Tucson az and they ran codes and said i had bad eg r and possibly other things wrong. Said it would take two days to fix assuming they had parts. I elected to go on to phoenix az as they had better shop, longer hours, more parts on hand. They checked truck next day and said needed egr, they replaced it and falling day i was on my way to more valley ca to get loaded trailer to take to san Antonio tx. From phoenix to ca to phoenix, 700 miles i had to do parked regeneration 4 times. Stopped in phoenix Sunday morn and put truck back into shop. This time codes showed bad injection, air valve and filter needed cleaning. Completed job that day and i was on road to san Antonio tx. after san Antonio i went to Austin area and loaded for phoenix area. Inrou

  2. 2. Charlie naush [ October 27, 2014 @ 06:07AM ]

    We have three trucks with this engine and we've spent several thousand dollars and had significant down time. What law firm is handling the class action and can our company participate or do we need to file our own litigation?

 

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

Newsletter

We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.



GotQuestions?

LUBRICANTS

The expert, Mark Betner from Citgo will answer your questions
Ask a question

Sponsored by

Magazine