NTSB to Investigate Latest Autonomous Vehicle Crash
Despite human error appearing to be the cause of the crash of an autonomous shuttle van in Las Vegas earlier this week, the National Transportation Safety Board is sending investigators to look at the accident more closely, according to a report by Reuters News Agency.
by Staff
November 10, 2017
NTSB will investigate the latest autonomous vehicle crash, which occured the first day on the job for this AAA/Keolis electric van. Photo: Twitter
2 min to read
NTSB will investigate the latest autonomous vehicle crash, which occured the first day on the job for this AAA/Keolis electric van. Photo: Twitter
Despite human error appearing to be the cause of the crash of an autonomous shuttle van in Las Vegas earlier this week, the National Transportation Safety Board is sending investigators to look at the accident more closely, according to a report by Reuters News Agency.
Ad Loading...
According to news reports, an autonomous, electric-powered van called Navya Arma, operated by Keolis North America, went into service in Las Vegas on Nov. 8. A few hours after starting its maiden voyage, a delivery truck backed into the stopped shuttle, according to a reporter on the shuttle and one of its sponsor companies. The Automobile Association of America, which is co-sponsoring the autonomous van’s deployment with Keolis, said it would assist NTSB in the investigation.
Ad Loading...
Past accidents involving autonomous vehicles have been blamed on the inflexibility of the programing in a dynamic driving environment and inability to adapt to minor situational variations as a human driver would. And that seems to be the case in this instance as well.
According to Reuters, reporter Jeff Zurschmeide, who was on the shuttle at the time of the crash, said the self-driving vehicle did what it was programmed to do-- but not everything a human driver might do.
“That’s a critical point,” Zurschmeide wrote on digitaltrends.com. “We had about 20 feet of empty street behind us (I looked), and most human drivers would have thrown the car into reverse and used some of that space to get away from the truck. Or at least leaned on the horn and made our presence harder to miss.”
Indeed, it seems a fundamental flaw in autonomous vehicle programming is the technology’s inability to deal with unpredictable human drivers. According to Reuters, the Las Vegas crash follows a rising number of incidents involving human drivers behaving improperly or recklessly around self-driving cars.
There have been 12 such crashes in California alone since Sept. 8 involving General Motors Co’s self-driving unit, Cruise Automation. All were the fault of human drivers in other vehicles, GM told regulators.
Related: Autonmous Tech May Bring Massive Changes to Trucking
The Department of Labor plans to expand Pell Grant eligibility to some shorter workforce training programs, a move the American Trucking Associations said will help strengthen commercial driver training schools and diesel technician training programs.
For an industry that has watched this issue go back and forth for years, the independent contractor proposal marks the latest swing in the regulatory pendulum.
America’s Service Line adopted Link’s SmartValve and ROI Cabmate systems to address whole-body vibration, repetitive strain, and driver turnover. The trucking fleet is already seeing measurable results.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration issued more than 550 notices of proposed removal to commercial driver training providers following a five-day nationwide enforcement sweep. Investigators cited unqualified instructors, improper training vehicles, and failure to meet federal and state requirements.
Illinois is the latest state targeted and threatened with the loss of highway funding by the U.S. Department of Transportation in its review of states' non-domiciled CDL issuance procedures. The state is pushing back.
After a legal pause last fall, FMCSA has finalized its rule limiting non-domiciled commercial driver's licenses. The agency says the change closes a safety gap, and its revised economic analysis suggests workforce effects will be more gradual than first thought.