"Somewhat Contentious" Hearing on Hours of Service, EOBRs Also Discussed

June 18, 2013

By Oliver Patton

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe
Steve Williams, chairman and CEO of Maverick USA, presented the views of American Trucking Associations.

He said the changes are not necessary for safety and that although the impact is hard to measure in advance he’s sure there will be productivity losses and higher operating costs.

Enforcement's View

Major Mark Savage, president of the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance, said that inspectors see the new rule as “fairly straightforward” but are concerned that parts of it may be difficult to enforce.

Without a corresponding requirement for supporting documents, drivers may be able to cheat on the 34-hour restart, the 30-minute break and the definition of on-duty time, he said.

At the same time, he acknowledged that new requirements for supporting documents will be included in the pending electronic logging mandate. It probably will take a couple of years for FMCSA to get that rule to be in place, however.

Edward Stocklin, an over-dimension hauler representing the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, said the new rule will restrict the flexibility he needs to run his business.

The 34-hour restart will lead to him spending more time away from home and on the road, and he’ll be hard-pressed to pull over and park his oversized loads for the 30-minute break, he said.

Joan Claybrook, consumer co-chair of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, said that although the 34-hour restart restrictions are a step in the right direction, FMCSA should have cut the daily driving limit from 11 to 10 hours.

She noted that a federal appeals court twice upheld Advocates’ challenges of earlier versions of the rule, and that the matter is back in court now because the group does not like the new rule.


The hearing gave Steve Williams, well known in the industry as a forceful proponent of electronic logging, the opportunity to press his case. The hours of service rules are only a part of the safety solution, and he said electronic logging is the missing link.

“We need to make sure we mandate eobrs or the rest of this is all irrelevant,” he said.

Why are they so critical? asked Rep. Rick Crawford, R-Ark.

“We’re all trying to get to the real facts,” Williams replied. Maverick uses elogs and can manage its truck usage to the minute, he said. “(Electronic logs) give you data so you can manage. Most important, they give law enforcement with CSA the tools to focus on carriers that have problems.”

Asked for a status report, Ferro said the agency will have an elog proposal out this fall.

But, proving that the industry is not of one mind on this issue, Stocklin of OOIDA said elogs would spell the end of his business.

“If they force me to do it I’ll just quit,” he said.

« Previous  |  1  2  3  |  Next »


  1. 1. Alan [ June 19, 2013 @ 03:21AM ]

    FMCSA & Anne Ferro are examples of Government gone rouge. They change the rules as they see fit because they know what is best for the industry. It has already been said now they did not know exactly what the cost would be to the industry but the cost will be much higher than they anticipated. No kidding! To saddle our industry with more cost is exactly what this administration wants to do. This rouge administration wants to put any and all industries on the brink of disaster so big brother can come in to say let us help you fix things. But we will need to tax you just a little more. Trouble is there will be nothing left to give! By the way in case nobody realized this our country is broke! None of these government officials ever had a real job anyway. Sad people!

  2. 2. Richard Pingel [ June 23, 2013 @ 04:47PM ]

    We can finally thank Steve Williams for admitting that EOBR/ELD's are used to "manage truck use to the minute". What more definition do you need for harassment or coercion. Time management and compliance do not equal SAFETY..

  3. 3. Mike B [ August 21, 2013 @ 10:41AM ]

    Can someone one that works in Washington and reads this please explain to me why they seem to thing more rules solve all the problems. I have been in the trucking industry for 30 years & the last 10 years it seems like Washington is giving into the pressure of the public about how bad the people in trucking are.

    we need higher wages how about working on that then you can cut the driving hours to 40 a week & nobody will care they can still make a living. it would be so mucher safer out there. do you realize when you cut driving hours you cut someones paycheck or do you really care.


Comment On This Story

Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.


We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.


ELDs and Telematics

sponsored by
sponsor logo

Scott Sutarik from Geotab will answer your questions and challenges

View All

Sleeper Cab Power

Steve Carlson from Xantrex will answer your questions and challenges

View All