A false log was No. 10 in the list of top 20 driver violations in 2015. As a motor carrier, you’re liable for false logs filled out by your drivers if you should have had the means to detect the violations.
by Tom Bray
February 29, 2016
Drivers may falsify paper logs for various reasons. The best way to identify a false log is by comparing the log with related documents to verify whether the driver’s entires are indeed true and correct.Photos: Jim Park
4 min to read
Drivers may falsify paper logs for various reasons. The best way to identify a false log is by comparing the log with related documents to verify whether the driver’s entires are indeed true and correct. Photos: Jim Park
A false log was No. 10 in the list of top 20 driver violations in 2015, with 31,575 violations reported by mid-December. As a motor carrier, you’re liable for false logs filled out by your drivers if you should have had the means to detect the violations.
Ad Loading...
What is the best way of identifying a false log? By comparing the log with related documents to verify whether the driver’s entries are indeed true and correct. In fact, Section 395.8(k) of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations requires motor carriers to retain “supporting” documents for at least six months.
Ad Loading...
Drivers may falsify paper logs for a number of reasons:
Needing to make an on-time delivery and not enough time was allotted
Needing to make up for lost time (such as a loading delay or staying too long at a truck stop)
Anxious to get home
Wanting to maximize mileage (especially if paid by the mile)
Getting behind on paperwork
While auditing a log for violations of the hours-of-service limits and form-and-manner violations is critical, the auditing process should not stop there. Looking for log falsification, as tedious as it can be, must be an integral step of log auditing.
A DOT interpretation provides a long list of possible supporting documents, including:
Verifying entries on the log against paperwork such as the items listed above is the way to find false entries.
Verifying log entries is fairly simple
If you are using a log auditing program or system, make sure you know exactly what the system is checking. You may want to add manual steps to make sure you are doing a thorough job of identifying log falsification.
To begin, locate the date and time on a supporting document. Next, take the driver’s log for the day and check the driver’s location at the time provided on the supporting document. Do they correlate?
At times, this may require some interpretation. For example, take a toll receipt. Toll receipts do not have any on-duty time associated with them. Therefore, you will need to look back at the time the driver started driving and review the time and distance from the starting time to the toll location. Here is an example:
Ad Loading...
After completing a 10-hour break, a driver’s log shows “driving” starting at 8 a.m. at Metropolis, Ill. A toll billing statement or receipt, which is a supporting document, shows the driver paying a toll at Rockford, Ill., at 11 a.m.
The driver’s log shows that the driver arrived in Wausau, Wis., (with no breaks) for a delivery appointment at 4 p.m.
The distance from Metropolis, Ill. to Rockford, Ill., is 413 miles. Depending on the normal operating speed of the fleet, the traffic encountered, and the speed limits for the roads involved, the amount of driving time should be somewhere between 7 and 8.25 hours of driving.
When these data points are connected, it is obvious that the log is false. The driver would have had to have started driving well before 8 a.m. to be in Rockford at 11:00 a.m. A more likely starting time for the day was between 2:30 and 4 a.m. A likely scenario is that the driver cut the 10-hour break short to be able to make it to Wausau on time.
Another way to identify falsification is by checking the “point-to-point” mileages on the driver’s log. In the example above, the mileage guide places the mileage from Metropolis to Wausau at 615 miles. This converts to 10.25 to 12.5 hours of driving. In our example, the driver showed 8 hours of driving, which provides further verification that the log is false.
Using supporting documents that can be tied to on-duty time, such as pickup and delivery receipts, bills of lading, fuel receipts, customs clearance paperwork, and roadside inspection and crash reports, is an easier process. With these supporting documents it is simply a matter of checking that the on-duty time, or the “flag” indicating a short change in duty status, is at the appropriate time. (Be sure to account for any time zone changes.)
In some situations, you may need to allow a little leeway when matching supporting documents to logs. This may be the case when the time on the supporting document cannot be validated.
Ad Loading...
Selecting logs to verify entries
Since the verification process is time-consuming, it may not be possible to check all of your drivers’ logs for false entries. In that case, you might select logs to review based on criteria such as the following:
Drivers involved in a crash
Drivers placed out of service for hours-of-service violations
Drivers placed out of service for any reason
Drivers who received an hours-of-service violation on the road
Drivers with a history of hours-of-service violations
The “top performing” drivers from the previous month
New drivers
Drivers never audited before
Random selection
If you are using a log auditing program or system, make sure you know exactly what the system is checking. You may want to add manual steps to make sure you are doing a thorough job of identifying log falsification.
By following the steps outlined above, you should have higher-than-average odds of keeping this violation off of your company’s and drivers’ inspection and audit records.
Tom Bray is a senior editor of J.J. Keller & Associates, specializing in motor carrier safety and operations management.
The Department of Labor plans to expand Pell Grant eligibility to some shorter workforce training programs, a move the American Trucking Associations said will help strengthen commercial driver training schools and diesel technician training programs.
For an industry that has watched this issue go back and forth for years, the independent contractor proposal marks the latest swing in the regulatory pendulum.
America’s Service Line adopted Link’s SmartValve and ROI Cabmate systems to address whole-body vibration, repetitive strain, and driver turnover. The trucking fleet is already seeing measurable results.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration issued more than 550 notices of proposed removal to commercial driver training providers following a five-day nationwide enforcement sweep. Investigators cited unqualified instructors, improper training vehicles, and failure to meet federal and state requirements.
Illinois is the latest state targeted and threatened with the loss of highway funding by the U.S. Department of Transportation in its review of states' non-domiciled CDL issuance procedures. The state is pushing back.
After a legal pause last fall, FMCSA has finalized its rule limiting non-domiciled commercial driver's licenses. The agency says the change closes a safety gap, and its revised economic analysis suggests workforce effects will be more gradual than first thought.