All That's Trucking

Hell Doesn’t Have to Freeze Over to Improve Trucking’s Image

Guest post from Evan Lockridge, Senior Contributing Editor

October 24, 2013

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe

As the American Trucking Associations annual Management Conference and Exhibition started winding down on Tuesday afternoon in Orlando, Fla., after a hot-and-humid four days, one announcement made near the end following many other press conferences made me wonder if hell was about to freeze over and was I going to have to ice skate back home rather than going to the airport.

It was the launch of Trucking Moves America Forward, described as a “fundraising effort for an industrywide movement centered on a positive image and a more robust connection with policymakers and the general public.”

In other words, trucking is embarking on yet another image campaign. This one is spearheaded by the Allied Committee for Transportation, known as ACT 1. The goal is to raise a million bucks each year, starting at the Mid-America Trucking Show in 2014, for the next five years, for “an industry-wide movement centered on a positive image and a more robust connection with policymakers and the general public.”

ADVERTISEMENT

I suppressed a yawn at the thought of yet another image campaign.

It’s not that I am not against trucking having a better image with the public (although I wonder in this day when word of something negative can travel around the world on the Internet in the blink of an eye, is there anyone who actually has a positive image?) But what was said next woke me up.

Outgoing ATA Chairman Mike Card, who is going to be the fundraising chair, said he hoped this effort wasn't just going to include the usual cast of characters such as ATA, the Truckload Carriers Association, along with a litany of industry product and service providers. He said he hoped it would include the Owner Operator Independent Drivers Association and the Teamsters Union.

Did I just hear right?

The conventional wisdom is that trucking management, such as ATA, and driver groups and organized labor can never agree on anything. Just listen to testimony on Capitol Hill from their representatives or read their press releases, which are sometimes loaded with cheap rhetoric.

But the fact is there are those rare occasions when they do agree -- and that is the foundation for what this industry needs if it wants to look less like a bunch of arguing boobs like our current Congress.

For instance, the recent (and surprisingly quick and bipartisan) passage by Congress and the signing into law by President Obama of legislation prohibiting the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration from issuing guidance on the subject of truckers and sleep apnea was supported nearly unanimously by the many groups in trucking, including ATA, OOIDA and the Teamsters.

While OOIDA and the Teamsters have reportedly been solicited to participate in this campaign, there is no guarantee they will agree. If that happens, it would be disappointing, and not just because they would be left out of a campaign that represents a key component of trucking.

Getting trucking management together with two groups representing drivers might also bring a bit of a sanity when it comes to toning down knee-jerk reactions many of these groups have been guilty of over the years. Cross-border trucking, the alleged "misclassification" of truck drivers at the ports, or mandatory electronic logs come to mind.

Sitting the different sides together for an image campaign could provide the opportunity for representatives of these different groups to get to know more about one another, rather than just reading what their “opponents” are saying in news stories and through their press releases.

Imagine a meeting between the leaders of ATA, OOIDA and Teamsters. I don’t recall it ever happening in the two-plus decades I have been covering trucking. If it were to happen, I seriously doubt it would rip apart the time-space continuum as we know it.

Such a meeting might result in not only talk about image, but also some serious and thoughtful discussion of the other issues in trucking that affect everyone in the business.

That might just lead to…dare I say the word…compromise! I am sure there are some naysayers who will say there are some issues in trucking where there is no room for compromise. To that, I say, can’t you at least listen to a side other than your own?

Such a united presentation by trucking could help portray a better image of the industry to the outside world, including policymakers, not to mention the general public, which is the goal of this campaign – with the added benefit of having the trucking industry sound more intelligent and less fractured than it has in the past.

That's something I wouldn’t mind ice-skating home to.

Comments

  1. 1. John [ October 25, 2013 @ 07:07AM ]

    People tend to mirror how they feel. I believe truck drivers are reduced to slave labor especially in the over the road segment. That they have become what they feel they are in the eyes of themselves and the public. Image is everything, but a disrespect from the customers and their own companies is why the truck driver has lowed its overall image. I cannot say I blame the drivers for feeling no concern about their image anymore. The lack of pay, long hours and constantly changing regulations. Are simply lowering their moral even more. Its not attracting people who had much respect for themselves anyway. These have become jobs that only desperate people take. Whenever you have such high turnover, your going to have a lowering standard and quality of worker.

  2. 2. Wade Haught [ October 28, 2013 @ 04:50AM ]

    John's comments point out the difficulty facing regulators. John writes about a group of drivers who are treated like slaves. He refers to high turnover. That describes many fleets with poor management and broken business models, but does not decribe my life as an owner operator. My problem Is the attempt by regulators to create one-size-fits-all solutions for problems I don't have.

  3. 3. MillionsOfMiles [ October 28, 2013 @ 11:16AM ]

    OOIDA and the Teamsters working with fleet management to foster a better image for trucking? Good luck with that - they both are too dependent on the politics of victimization to build their organizations.

    Once you get past all the smoke-and-mirrors, neither of those two organizations (both ironically lead by “Jimmy’s”) has anyone in leadership who has been near the wheel of a truck in decades – if that. Yep, I can see it now, using Will and Sonny as spokesmen and recreating their 1970’s T.V. roll because every knows “Movin’ On” was a representative docu-drama depicting the real lives of truckers - hah!

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email: (Email will not be displayed.)  
Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.

Author Bio

Deborah Lockridge

Editor in Chief

Truck journalist 21 years, joined us in 1998. Plans and coordinates editorial, specializes in maintenance, drivers and fleet operations.

Sponsored by

Newsletter

We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.



GotQuestions?

LUBRICANTS

The expert, Mark Betner from Citgo will answer your questions
Ask a question

Sponsored by


WHEEL ENDS SOLUTIONS

Wheel end expert Jeff Geist from STEMCO will answer your questions
Ask a question

Sponsored by

Magazine