Commentary: The Unmanned Vision

July 2015, - Editorial

by Rolf Lockwood

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe
Rolf Lockwood, Executive Contributing Editor
Rolf Lockwood, Executive Contributing Editor

Amidst all the recent chatter about autonomous trucks and platooning, the story that might well be the most significant in this realm got a little lost in the shuffle.

Centered in the most unlikely of places, North Dakota, it’s a vision of how such technology can actually be put in place and bring economic benefit to a region.

It’s about a corridor as much as a region, as defined by CNATCA, the Central North American Trade Corridor Association.

It envisions the use of autonomous trucks traveling up and down Route 83 through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas, along with Manitoba to the north and Mexico to the south.

But they’re not talking ‘autonomous’ as in Freightliner’s Inspiration truck (see last month’s column). Almost all press reports have assumed that sort of vehicle, usually calling it driverless, which it’s not. In fact it sports so-called Level 3 autonomy where the driver remains in control but can give the wheel to the electronic wizardry when conditions permit.

But it’s unmanned trucks the CNATCA folks are talking about, namely Level 4 autonomy. Got that? Unmanned.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration defines Level 3 as enabling the driver to cede full control of all safety-critical functions under certain conditions. Level 0 means no automation at all, while Level 1 covers things like ABS. Level 2 combines automated capabilities as in adaptive cruise control.

Level 4 is complete automation, with or without a driver present. Freightliner has said firmly that it has no wish to go there, but who knows what’s possible if the market is pulling instead of being pushed as usual.

The CNATCA vision has these trucks programmed at launch to drive to destination X and deliver the freight, or pick it up, with no human intervention.

Volvo’s chief designer Jeff Cotner raised a useful question along these lines at a recent press event.

It's unmanned trucks these folks are talking about, namely Level 4 autonomy. Got that? Unmanned. 

“Why does the tractor have to pull everything?” he asked.

He sees trailers operating under their own power with no physical connection to a tractor, but free to join and follow in platoon formation with other similarly smart vehicles and then break off and drive themselves to different destinations along the way.

CNATCA spokesman Marlo Anderson sees the same thing.

Quoted a year ago by Jessica Holdman writing in The Bismarck Tribune in Bismarck, N.D., he said a self-moving flatbed trailer could be used to ship freight along the corridor.

“The technology is ahead of the regulations,” Anderson said.


  1. 1. Ellen Voie [ July 16, 2015 @ 12:10PM ]

    Rolf, shouldn't the term be "driverless?" :)

  2. 2. Davidtrucks [ July 16, 2015 @ 12:58PM ]

    We have tractor less trailer transport... ITis called the railroad!!!!

  3. 3. Gil Wortsmann [ July 16, 2015 @ 02:00PM ]


    Your statement confused me, at first. Tractor-less should have had a dash. The way it is written, would lead one to believe that there is a tractor without a trailer.


  4. 4. BarbRRB [ July 23, 2015 @ 06:42AM ]

    I have said all along this is a bad idea. Imagine hackers taking over the tractor trailer. I seen yesterday on the news, hackers took over a jeep and disabled the brakes. I have said all along that technology is wonderful and i do love it. When you take humans out of the equasion. Makes for a disaster.


Comment On This Story

Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.


We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.


ELDs and Telematics

sponsored by
sponsor logo

Scott Sutarik from Geotab will answer your questions and challenges

View All

Sleeper Cab Power

Steve Carlson from Xantrex will answer your questions and challenges

View All