Test Drive: MX-13 in a Peterbilt 365

April 2010, - Test Drives

by Tom Berg, Senior Editor, Senior Contributing Editor - Also by this author

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe
Paccar, the corporate parent of Kenworth Truck and Peterbilt Motors, should print up some new stickers that say, "Low Revs 'R' Us," then smack 'em on the dashboards of all trucks equipped with its new MX-13 diesel
Most Peterbilt 365s are built as dump trucks or mixers, but this one is set up as a city delivery tractor, with 4.11 axle gears and no aero fairings. (Photo by Tom Berg)
Most Peterbilt 365s are built as dump trucks or mixers, but this one is set up as a city delivery tractor, with 4.11 axle gears and no aero fairings. (Photo by Tom Berg)
. It seems as happy at 1,000 rpm as at 1,900, and it's as smooth down low as up high.

That's my main impression after about three hours behind the wheel of a Peterbilt 365 P&D tractor powered by an MX, mostly on Interstate highways in northern Texas, near Pete's Denton headquarters.

Unveiled in late January, the MX-13 is now the data-book standard in Class 8 KWs and Petes. Unlike the PX-6 and PX-8, the sole power for the companies' midrange trucks that are actually Cummins' ISB and ISC with proprietary accessories and dark-gray paint, the MX is a purely Paccar product. For now it's built in Holland by Paccar's DAF subsidiary. DAF has been designing and making truck diesels for more than 50 years and began building the first MX engines in 2005. This summer Paccar plans to activate its new $400 million assembly plant in Columbus, Miss., which will first trim MX engines sent from The Netherlands for North American use. Later the Mississippi plant will assemble the engines from parts sourced here and in Europe.

The MX is a quiet engine, Paccar people said when they showed it to news reporters at their tech center north of Seattle. At that time they allowed brief drives of MX-powered trucks on the big, oval test track; as installed in upscale highway tractors, the engines were almost inaudible. Two of the three tractors I drove there had Eaton UltraShift automated mechanical transmissions, and the engines were so unobtrusive that I paid more attention to how the trannies worked.

The engine

Not so a month later with the Pete 365. This is a more bare-bones vocational model usually built for construction work, but in this case it was outfitted for city pick-up and delivery duties. Its MX, rated at 485 horsepower and 1,650 pounds-feet, was mated to an Eaton Fuller 10-speed manual. The 365's cab seemed less insulated from outside noise, so engine sounds were more noticeable but still somewhat muted, and with no growls or barks to bring either enthusiasm or fatigue to a driver. It simply went about its work ably and efficiently. If I had first driven another tractor with an older, noisier engine and then hopped into this one, I might have been more impressed with the sound quality.

To meet federal 2010 exhaust emissions limits, the MX has advanced electronic controls, exhaust-gas recirculation, and selective catalytic reduction. Mechanical features include a single turbocharger (where some competitors use two), proven low-mounted camshaft-and-pushrod valve actuation (rather than newer-but-heavier overhead cams), a standard integrated compression brake (instead of an optional bolt-on retarder), standard full-flow and bypass oil filters (no aftermarket filtration needed), and a novel belt-driven water pump offset to the right so it's easy to get at and fix (versus removing a shroud and fan to reach the usual in-engine pump).

The MX also has rear-mounted timing gears to cut torsional vibrations, and its precisely cast crankshaft needs no counterweights. During manufacturing, connecting rods are frozen and end caps are cracked off along scribed lines, then drilled and bolted back together during assembly; the rough "fractured" surfaces cling together tightly and securely, preventing even slight wobbling (though each cap is therefore a mate to its con-rod and cannot be interchanged with another cap). All this enhances an inline six-cylinder engine's already smooth operation, as I discovered during this drive.

Both block and cylinder head are cast of compacted graphite iron, which makes them stiffer than if done in standard gray iron, and saves about 150 pounds, Paccar people said during the unveiling. A 12.9-liter (788-cubic-inch) MX weighs 325 pounds less than a 15-liter Cummins ISX, which remains optional, as do other Cummins diesels in various KWs and Petes. Paccar considers Cummins a valuable partner, as Cummins makes the PX-6 and -8 midrange engines, helped with MX development and supplies the MX's variable-nozzle turbo.

The drive

Much of this was reviewed for me during the Texas drive by my guide, Todd Wickstrum, Peterbilt's Paccar-engine field service liaison manager. He advises customers and dealer sales people on how to set up trucks with the new MX and how to drive and service it. He explained that this Model 365 daycab tractor was built to deliver a "blend" of performance and economy for a fleet in Vancouver, British Columbia. It'll pull heavy trailers, like the Utility 53-by-102 test van hitched up for our run that was ballasted for a GCW of a little over 72,000 pounds. This tractor will see a lot of stops and starts, and freeway dashes might get above 100 kilometers per hour (kph is what the speedometer's larger numbers were calibrated in) but not much more.

So the stubby-looking Pete had short legs - 4.11 gears in the Dana rears and single-overdrive "C" gearing in the Fuller tranny. This caused the engine to spin at a busy 1,600 rpm at 100 kph (62 mph) after we left the Texas Motor Speedway, our rendezvous point, and ran north on I-35W and I-35 into southern Oklahoma. Wickstrum said some stiff grades up there would let the engine show off its lugging ability, but we ran out of time and turned around short of them so we could return to the speedway before it closed for the night.

An over-the-road tractor would have aero fairings and taller gearing, allowing the engine to loaf at 1,350 rpm at 65 mph, Wickstrum said, so "it would average 7 mpg, easy" in OTR operations, with higher numbers entirely likely. The instant readout on the dash for this truck was less impressive, but this P&D tractor was not as aerodynamic as its OTR brethren, and it was nearly new with only a few thousand miles on the clock. Test fleets have reported that once an MX breaks in at 80,000 to 100,000 miles, mpg goes up by 0.4 mpg.

(Instead of the Interstate trip, a better test of this tractor's city duty specifications might have been just running around access roads in the speedway complex, then buzzing into nearby Fort Worth to simulate some P&D stopping and starting.)

The compression brake is said to be capable of as much as 460 retarding horsepower, but didn't seem as strong while decelerating down shallow grades and freeway off-ramps. It was quiet, though, and drivers might find they can ignore "no engine brake" signs posted outside many towns and cities. At slow speeds in low-range gears, the brake aggressively slowed the truck and I had to declutch to keep the driveline from a-clunkin', and sometimes simply switched off the brake.


While we had no real highway grades to climb, I did do some slow lugging during turn-arounds at the speedway and while positioning the truck for photos. At one point I let speed drop so the tachometer read only 1,100 rpm, then tromped on the foot feed; the engine picked up quickly, with absolutely no vibration or groaning of any kind. I did it again from 900 rpm, with the same smooth results. It surprised me until I read the engine's specs and found that its stated torque peak is 1,100 rpm. You sure couldn't lug like that with big ol' diesels in the good ol' days.

Luggability also begs for drivers to upshift early and often. I usually grabbed the next gear at no more than 1,500 or 1,600 rpm, and even that was a little too much. Most drivers today still rev their engines way too high, so if you're a manager with some new MX engines beat the boys and girls over the head with a gearshift lever to get them to run the new engines correctly. Once they learn to keep revs down, everyone'll be happy.

From the April 2010 issue of Heavy Duty Trucking.


  1. 1. AMiller [ September 15, 2013 @ 04:07PM ]

    Have been in my 2014 T-680 for two weeks and I am not happy with the poor pulling power up hills. The Jake brake is so weak I wonder if it's on. This MX-13 would be fine for flat lands but not for over the road use were you have to ascend steep grades.

  2. 2. Brett Spiritwatcher [ September 29, 2014 @ 05:42AM ]

    Up/ down hill off road hwy and pipeline operation as an dump truck it is poor with the exception of slow dirt road movement, too high Center of Gravity, lousey jake brake make it a no repeat purchase.

  3. 3. Brian dean [ November 14, 2014 @ 11:32AM ]

    I'm running a '13 387 with a mx hauling camp shacks..modular buildings and it's a joke. No power and horrible economy. Nothing but problems with regen and turbo and Pete can never figure it out. We have 3 of them and they're all crappy. I think the motor could run strong but the ECM program is a joke

  4. 4. Al [ April 24, 2015 @ 06:09PM ]

    We got at least 10 new pete 389's with the mx 13 and they all run different but are the weakest engines I've EVER heard of, a few of them speed up at a slow but normal pace when you take off and some are dangerously slow. At 80k it takes me 22 seconds to hit 20mph on flat ground slamming and jamming and takes 29 up a hill, our old 60 series took 13 going UP a hill with 84k gross driving normall. I pull propane and crossing a road is a nightmare, every day I'm either holding my head in shame or scared I'm going to get hit and lose my job. The ppl at paccar should absolutely be ashamed of themselves

  5. 5. Mel [ April 25, 2015 @ 04:36PM ]

    I agree with Al's post. Have a T800 w/MX13. We run Boom trucks here. Had identical loads on MX13 - 485 and ISM-385. From dead stop took MX engine 7 miles to catch up. Also mx has been back to dealer aprox. 35 times in the first 2 years for software issues. Would never buy one again.

  6. 6. Wild Bill [ May 11, 2015 @ 11:56AM ]

    I'm running the 2015 567 pete. I admit the first generation Mx had issues but they fix them. with the 500 horsepower MX 13 I Love it. I've got a hundred sixteen thousand miles on this truck since I've got it the only thing I had to have done was the to lift fuel pumps. You can't drive it like a v8 Detroit this is a low rev engine. Thus far as the Jake goes it works great you just can't hear it that's why you thinking it Doesn'tt work and I'll come off Wolf Creek Pass and eighty thousand pounds I don't touch my breaks all the way down.This engine out pulls are 475 aCERT caterpillars and just Barely lags behind ours 15.6 lter Detroit.'s

  7. 7. denny [ March 22, 2016 @ 03:21AM ]

    Mx13 have one in a 2015 t800 kenworth, haulimg oversize precast,, this engine puts the cummins to shame,,, cummins 450 can't keep up,,, I love the pacarr

  8. 8. Chris [ July 16, 2016 @ 08:22PM ]

    I have the mx13 in my 389 peterbilt car hauler, and so far I love it, my last truck had the c15 cat and I don't miss it at all....

  9. 9. Kristan grafton [ November 04, 2016 @ 10:27AM ]

    I bought a 2012 peterbilt 388 with paccar motor 10 speed low induction continue to have problems check engine light comes on with faults found delta pressure see owners Manuel take it to kenworth in there for the last week told that this is going to happen every 3 to 4 months because of soot that builds up around the sensors and nothing can be done to prevent this from happening. Wtf only own 1 truck and unfortunately I picked this one with this paccar motor. My advise for anyone else is not to go with a paccar motor so sorry I did. Can't make any money at this when I'm having to pay mechanics $1,800.00 every 3 to 4 months just to keep my truck running..

  10. 10. Kristan grafton [ November 06, 2016 @ 02:25PM ]

    [email protected]

  11. 11. Ted W [ January 21, 2017 @ 10:23AM ]

    I run a '14 Peterbilt 367 roll-off with a mx-13 (500 hp and 1850 tq) mated with an 18-speed Eaton. I've had the truck loaded to 38 tonnes (84,000 lbs) without a trailer, and the max with a trailer at 60 tonnes (132000 lbs).

    I think the 18 speed makes all the difference. I find the torque band is narrow and low; the truck loves to shift around 1250-1350 rpm. I can't imagine trying to drive it with a 13 or an automatic.

    My only complaint is that the engine brake isn't strong enough, but a Jake brake isn't an option with the truck.


Comment On This Story

Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.


We offer e-newsletters that deliver targeted news and information for the entire fleet industry.


ELDs and Telematics

sponsored by
sponsor logo

Scott Sutarik from Geotab will answer your questions and challenges

View All

Sleeper Cab Power

Steve Carlson from Xantrex will answer your questions and challenges

View All